loads of content was vs loads of content were

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Loads of content was' is correct when referring to a singular entity, while 'Loads of content were' is correct when referring to multiple entities. The choice between 'was' and 'were' depends on whether the noun 'content' is considered singular or plural.

Last updated: March 31, 2024 • 1574 views

This phrase is correct when referring to a singular entity.

"loads of content was"

Use 'loads of content was' when 'content' is considered a singular entity.

Examples:

Loads of content was uploaded to the website.
Loads of content was created for the marketing campaign.

Show examples from the web [+]

So the lift was never stationary long enough in the sub-basement to load the contents of the vault.
I was pleased to note Amendments Nos 6 and 7 to the van Velzen report clearly acknowledging that the question of content was a problem.
'standard cotton programme' means the cycle which dries cotton laundry with an initial moisture content of the load of 60 % up to a remaining moisture content of the load of 0 %.
Portable tanks shall be designed to withstand, without loss of contents, at least the internal pressure due to the contents, and the static, dynamic and thermal loads during normal conditions of handling and transport.
Loads of bands use drum loops.
You know Quintanus laid loads of mosaics.
Loads of kids with firework burns.
The contents was a bottle half full of white powder.
Number of premises where VOC contents was checked
None of the content was flammable or explosive.
Gastric content was negative for spores, so no mushroom toxicity.
Select here country name of content origin.
The problems of content are quite obvious.
And there was a load of lingers-on, a load of leeches.
There was just a... load of these people.
You represent "Enchant" in Latin America, loads of models envy you...
I told you it takes loads of practice.
These ruts are deep as if he's carrying a load of dinars.
The trains brought loads of policemen.
For 10 years, after bankruptcy our dream and load of guilt.

Alternatives:

A lot of content was
Plenty of content was
Tons of content was
A large amount of content was
An abundance of content was

This phrase is correct when referring to multiple entities.

"loads of content were"

Use 'loads of content were' when 'content' is considered plural.

Examples:

Loads of content were available for download.
Loads of content were shared on social media.

Show examples from the web [+]

So the lift was never stationary long enough in the sub-basement to load the contents of the vault.
It would be useful if a table of contents were added, as is the case for the General Financial Regulation.
'standard cotton programme' means the cycle which dries cotton laundry with an initial moisture content of the load of 60 % up to a remaining moisture content of the load of 0 %.
He swore its contents were innocent.
Stomach contents were just milk and cookies.
Foodwise, the contents were unremarkable, but I did stumble upon a very aggressive foodborne bacteria.
When you hear a click sound that means the entire contents were injected.
Both their stomach contents were the same.
What a contrast with Seattle in 1999, when debates on content were overshadowed by clashes on the street.
His rooms and all of their contents were destroyed.
In twelve cases, the contents were above EU limit values.
Portable tanks shall be designed to withstand, without loss of contents, at least the internal pressure due to the contents, and the static, dynamic and thermal loads during normal conditions of handling and transport.
Loads of bands use drum loops.
You know Quintanus laid loads of mosaics.
Loads of kids with firework burns.
Some of the times I felt most content were those spent watching the seedlings grow in the airponics...
The contents were mundane, but they warranted A bullet-pointed list, nevertheless.
The display cases in the living room were broken into and their contents were missing.
His stomach contents were "unusually well-preserved."
When the first account was closed, its contents were funneled into various offshore accounts.

Alternatives:

A lot of content were
Plenty of content were
Tons of content were
A large amount of content were
An abundance of content were

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

Emails and short texts
Proofreading & editing
Ready in 5-10 minutes

SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

Documents of any type (*.docx)
Advanced & Premium editing
Ready in as little as 4 hours

UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

Personalized answers to your language questions
Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
Ready in 24 hours

ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

3. Receive Your Polished Text

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Zubair
from Bangladesh

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Arturo
from Mexico

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Selena
from USA

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Ifiok
from Nigeria

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Wilson
from France

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Susan
from Germany

loads of content was vs loads of content were