1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

"little trace of blood" vs "was much trace"

The correct phrase is 'little trace of blood.' The phrase 'was much trace' is incorrect in English. 'Little trace of blood' is a common expression used to indicate a small amount of blood, while 'was much trace' does not make sense in this context.

Last Updated: March 21, 2024

little trace of blood

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used to describe a small amount of blood that is barely noticeable or present.

Examples:

  • There was a little trace of blood on the bandage.
  • After the accident, there was only a little trace of blood on the floor.
  • The detective found a little trace of blood at the crime scene.
  • She wiped away the little trace of blood from her finger.
  • The doctor noticed a little trace of blood in the patient's urine sample.

was much trace

This phrase is incorrect in English and does not make sense.

Related Comparisons

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!