🎁 A holiday package to celebrate the season! Click here and shop now!

TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

listed in table vs are listed in Table

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Listed in table' is used when referring to items or data that are included in a table, while 'are listed in table' is used when emphasizing the action of listing items in a table. The choice between the two depends on whether you want to focus on the items themselves or the action of listing them.

Last updated: March 30, 2024 • 776 views

listed in table

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to items or data that are included in a table.

This phrase is used to indicate that certain items or data are included in a table. It is a concise way to refer to the content of a table.

Examples:

  • The names of the participants are listed in the table.
  • The prices of the products are listed in the table.
  • The countries and their capitals are listed in the table.
  • Feb 2, 2022 ... I'm sure this is probably an easy question to answer and probably asked here before. But why isn't NM-B listed in table 310.4(A)?
  • ... Listed in Table Views. About Sorting and Filtering Objects Listed in Table Views. You can use the various sort and filter options available in the File Open ...
  • Feb 14, 2012 ... Which Command? A paragraph, first word bold, not listed in table of contents ... i couldnt find this on web search, my prof. told me to use a " ...
  • Mar 21, 2016 ... Query All Databases Listed In Table · 1. So, have you tried to write any solution for this? · Try SP_MSFOREACHTABLE or dynamic sql. Should be ...
  • Mar 11, 2021 ... Tabset content is not listed in table of contents #2069. Closed. 1 task done. nvelden opened this issue on Mar 11, 2021 · 5 comments. Closed.
  • Fixtures not listed in Table 709.1 shall have a drainage fixture unit load based on the outlet size of the fixture in accordance with Table 709.2.
  • 1 The offenses listed in TABLE I or TABLE II also affect eligibility for regulatory approval (ex. license or certification) or non-client residency in ...
  • Sep 27, 2007 ... COMPRESS provides the material properties listed in Table Y-1 from ASME Section II Part D. Not all "Code" materials may have material ...
  • Jan 30, 2023 ... This is purposeful and we no longer require this information to be reported. These persons may be listed in Table 4 of the COA template if they ...
  • For one of the binary systems listed in Table 13.10, based on Eq. (13.19) and the Wilson equation, prepare a Pxy diagram for t 60°C.

Alternatives:

  • included in the table
  • found in the table
  • presented in the table
  • displayed in the table
  • detailed in the table

are listed in Table

This phrase is correct and commonly used when emphasizing the action of listing items in a table.

This phrase is used to highlight the action of listing items in a table. It is suitable when focusing on the process of creating the table.

Examples:

  • The items are listed in the table in alphabetical order.
  • The data are listed in the table for easy reference.
  • The results are listed in the table for comparison.
  • Types of fairway information are listed in Table 4.6.
  • Other adverse reactions reported very rarely for desloratadine during the post-marketing period are listed in Table 2.
  • Derogations from Criterion 1(a) are listed in Table 1.
  • Studies using the proposed reference chemicals should be evaluated in the vehicle with which they are listed in Table 1.
  • Adverse events reported in the ESPRIT trial are listed in Table 3.
  • annual contributions are listed in Table 2.
  • The track types used in this method are listed in Table [2.3.b] below.
  • The amounts of these grants from 2000 to 2008 are listed in Table 3.
  • TMZ dose levels are listed in Table 2. b:
  • Qualifying limits for acceptance based on different numbers of test results for each grouping of characteristics are listed in Table 2 as maximum number of non-compliance.
  • The Community and Swiss domestic reference prices for agricultural raw materials mentioned in Articles 3 and 4 are listed in Table III.
  • Qualifying limits for acceptance based on different numbers of test results for each grouping of characteristics are listed in Table 4 given as a percentage of the results, assuming an acceptance probability of at least 0,95.
  • The various methods to be used are listed in table 1.
  • All dangerous goods entries are listed in table A of Chapter 3.2 in the numerical order of their UN Number.
  • Substances and articles classified in Class 4.2 are listed in table A of Chapter 3.2.
  • The pharmacokinetic parameters derived from a crossover study of ADVATE in 100 previously treated patients >= 10 years of age are listed in table 3 below.
  • ADRs considered by the investigator to be possibly, probably, or remotely related to the administration of Xeloda are listed in Table 4 for Xeloda given as a single agent and in Table 5 for Xeloda given in combination with different chemotherapy regimens in multiple indications.
  • The hazard classifications restricted are listed in Table 5.
  • Furthermore, each of these attributes is characterised by certain technical properties, which are listed in Table 3.
  • Recommended reference substances and their Pow values are listed in Table 1.

Alternatives:

  • have been listed in the table
  • have been included in the table
  • have been placed in the table
  • have been recorded in the table
  • have been documented in the table

Related Comparisons

in brochure vs in brochures which are listed in Table vs which listed in Table is quantified in Table vs quantified in Table are listed in the following vs are listed on the following is also quantified in Table vs is quantified in Table The results are illustrated in Table vs The results are shown in Table

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!

×

💝 TextRanch Holidays Offer! 💝️

25% special discount
Stock up on credits for the entire year!

Grab this offer now!