TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

limitation of liability vs limit of liability

Both 'limitation of liability' and 'limit of liability' are correct phrases, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'Limitation of liability' is commonly used in legal documents to specify the extent to which a party's liability is restricted, while 'limit of liability' is more commonly used in insurance policies to indicate the maximum amount an insurer will pay for a claim.

Last updated: March 30, 2024 • 623 views

limitation of liability

This phrase is correct and commonly used in legal contexts to specify the extent to which a party's liability is restricted.

This phrase is typically used in legal documents to define the boundaries of liability for a party involved in a contract or agreement.
  • No limitation of liability in limited partnerships.
  • Simultaneous application of other international conventions concerning the limitation of liability of shipowners
  • They sanction a principle that urgently needs to be modernised: limitation of liability.
  • The amount of the insurance for each and every ship per incident shall be equal to the relevant maximum amount for the limitation of liability as laid down in the 1996 Convention.
  • No limitation of liability in limited partnerships.
  • Revision of the amounts for limitation of liability and unit of account
  • Compulsory insurance and limitation of liability of insurers
  • Member States shall take the necessary measures to adapt their national law to the provisions on limitation of liability under the 1996 Convention.
  • ARTICLE 19 Other conventions on limitation of liability
  • The limitation of liability should apply against the company audited and any third party entitled under national law to bring a claim for compensation.
  • This Convention shall not modify the rights or duties of the carrier, the performing carrier, and their servants or agents provided for in international conventions relating to the limitation of liability of owners of seagoing ships.
  • marine pollution, limitation of liability for maritime claims, general average, and emergency towage and salvage;
  • However, because the ZT, as a legal person under public law, cannot invoke the rights accorded to private persons under the German Basic Law, this limitation of liability does not apply to the ZT.
  • This Convention does not modify the rights or duties of the carrier provided for in international conventions or national law relating to the limitation of liability of owners of inland navigation or maritime vessels.
  • I think a better term, and for all our sakes, a more accurate one, is "limitation of liability."
  • provision allowing any company to be audited and the statutory auditor or audit firm to determine a limitation of liability in an agreement.
  • Whereas the rules on the nature and limitation of liability in the event of death, wounding or any other bodily injury suffered by a passenger form part of the terms and conditions of carriage in the air transport contract between carrier and passenger;
  • Limitation of liability of carriers, etc.
  • Limitation of liability is at the expense of the environment.
  • Member States which are still party to the 1976 Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims must denounce it.

Alternatives:

  • liability limitation
  • restriction of liability
  • liability cap

limit of liability

This phrase is correct and commonly used in insurance policies to indicate the maximum amount an insurer will pay for a claim.

This phrase is often found in insurance contracts to specify the highest amount an insurance company will pay for a covered loss or claim.
  • The limit of liability for the registry administrator.
  • This will have for effect not to have a harmonised limit of liability through the European Union.
  • A State Party, which makes use of the option provided for in this paragraph, shall inform the Secretary-General of the limit of liability adopted or of the fact that there is none.
  • ARTICLE 7 Limit of liability for death and personal injury
  • This convention provides that the airline is presumed to be liable for damage and sets the limit of liability at USD 10000.
  • ARTICLE 8 Limit of liability for loss of or damage to luggage and vehicles
  • In such case, the amount set out in paragraph 1 applies as the limit of liability of the insurer or other person providing financial security, even if the carrier or the performing carrier is not entitled to limitation of liability.
  • As Article 7(2) of the Athens Convention concerns the limit of liability for death and personal injury, it is safer to specify that the application of this provision can be amended only through the co-decision procedure.
  • Does the limit of liability referred to in Article 22.2 of the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage, signed in Montreal on 28 May 1999, include both non-material damage and material damage resulting from the loss of baggage?
  • The Protocol allows a State Party to regulate by specific provisions of national law the limit of liability for personal injury and death, provided that the national limit of liability, if any, is not lower than that prescribed in the Protocol.
  • references to the requirements of national law, national limit of liability and national currency shall be construed respectively as references to the requirements of the law, the limit of liability and the currency of the relevant territorial unit; and
  • ARTICLE 8 Limit of liability for loss of or damage to luggage and vehicles1 The liability of the carrier for the loss of or damage to cabin luggage shall in no case exceed 2250 units of account per passenger, per carriage.

Alternatives:

  • liability limit
  • maximum liability
  • coverage limit

Related Comparisons

approach adoptable vs approach applicable in spite of not vs in spite of not ratifying limitations of the vs limitations to the limitations of our study vs limitations for our study influence of 9 vs influence of nine decreasing nephrotoxicity vs Jjk

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!