Letter Dated on 1st September vs Letter Dated 1st September

Both phrases are correct, but "letter dated 1st September" is more commonly used in English. The preposition "on" is often omitted when specifying the date in this context.

Last updated: March 23, 2024 • 2514 views

Letter Dated on 1st September

This phrase is correct but less commonly used in English.

This phrase is correct and can be used when specifying the date on which a letter was dated. However, the preposition "on" is often omitted in this context.

Examples:

The letter dated on 1st September was received by the recipient.
I found a letter dated on 1st September in the old files.

Show examples from the web [+]

Action brought on 1st September 2006 - Erbežnik v European Parliament
By letter dated on 5 December 2005 and supplemented by letter dated on 9 January 2006, the Italian authorities notified to the Commission a State aid scheme concerning tax rebates on oil emulsions with water.
A second request of information was sent by letter dated on 5 September 2005. The reply to this request was sent by the Czech authorities by letter dated on 5 October 2005.
In accordance with the article 12(6) of the legal base, on 1st September of each year, at least EUR 125 million (25%) should remain available in order to cover the needs arising until the end of the year.
In accordance with the article 12(6) of the legal base, on 1st September of each year, at least EUR 125 million should remain available in order to cover the needs arising until the end of the year.
By means of the letter dated on 10 November 2009 reproduced in the authentic language on the pages following this summary, the Commission notified Portugal of its decision to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty concerning the abovementioned measure.
A third request of information was sent by letter on 1 December 2005. The reply to this request was sent by the Czech authorities by letter dated on 9 January 2006.
By letter registered on 30 July 2007, the Commission forwarded the third party comments to the Dutch authorities. The authorities submitted their observations by letter dated on 17 September 2007.
Art. 12 (6) of the EGF Regulation requests that on 1st September at least 25% of the annual maximum amount of the EGF shall remain available in order to cover needs arising until the end of the year.
Art. 12 (6) of the EGF Regulation requests that on 1st September at least 25% (EUR 125 million) of the annual maximum amount of the EGF, shall remain available in order to cover needs arising until the end of the year.
Art. 12 (6) of the EGF Regulation requests that on 1st September at least 25% of the annual maximum amount of the EGF shall remain available in order to cover needs arising until the end of the year.
Art. 12 (6) of the EGF Regulation requests that on 1st September at least 25% of the annual maximum amount of the EGF shall remain available in order to cover needs arising until the end of the year.
Germany replied by letter dated 31 March 2000.
Spain provided comments by letter dated 10 November 2003.
Italy submitted comments by letter dated 22 December 2003.
Italy submitted comments by letter dated 22 December 2003.
Germany replied by letter dated 14 December 2007.
The Luxembourg authorities replied by letter dated 30 March 2004.
Slovenia submitted observations by letter dated 17 July 2006.
Sweden submitted observations by letter dated 27 September 2006.

Alternatives:

letter dated 1st September
letter dated September 1st

Letter Dated 1st September

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is the more common way to express that a letter was dated on a specific date, in this case, the 1st of September.

Examples:

The letter dated 1st September was sent out last week.
Please find attached the letter dated 1st September.

Show examples from the web [+]

Germany replied by letter dated 31 March 2000.
Spain provided comments by letter dated 10 November 2003.
Italy submitted comments by letter dated 22 December 2003.
Italy submitted comments by letter dated 22 December 2003.
Germany replied by letter dated 14 December 2007.
The Luxembourg authorities replied by letter dated 30 March 2004.
Slovenia submitted observations by letter dated 17 July 2006.
Sweden submitted observations by letter dated 27 September 2006.
Romania submitted information by letter dated 15 February 2007.
Italy replied by letter dated 28 January 2008.
Italy submitted observations by letter dated 25 October 2006.
Finland submitted further information by letter dated 12 February 2010.
Finland replied by letter dated 15 June 2011.
Finland replied by letter dated 1 July 2010.
Germany submitted its comments by letter dated 14 February 2005.
The Commission requested further clarifications by letter dated 22 January 2003.
From 2nd March to 1st September 2007,184 days.
By letter dated 3 January 2006, the Commission requested additional information about the transaction from the Swedish authorities, which was submitted by letters dated 2 March 2006 and 28 March 2006.
By letter dated 3 January 2006, the Commission requested additional information from the Swedish authorities, which was submitted by letters dated 2 and 28 March 2006.
The Commission stated its position in writing by letter dated 23 July 2002.

Alternatives:

letter dated September 1st
letter dated on September 1st

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9).

"Thank you!"
Sachi Nakama July 2024
"I have literally been through chat, PI, claude, bard and bing and I got conflicting answers! Thank you! Human intelligence reigns!"
Retha July 2024
"Faster than AI"
CYNTHIA December 2023
"This was very helpful and I personally think this site is the best."
Kaden October 2023
"It was extremely thorough and very helpful!"
imperialelisa October 2023
"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"
Zubair Alam October 2023
"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."
Selena October 2023
"Without textranch I would be stuck!"
宏祐 October 2023
"Accuracy and fast response. Personal comments from editor. Thank you."
Clh September 2023
"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"
Arturo September 2023
"The fact that you can get reliable fast feedback on your texts."
Vinicius Antonio August 2023
"you guys are better than grammarly i'm being honest here"
ordinary July 2023
"OMG! This is really good than any other text correction tools I've used so far. Highly recommend this."
Vehan July 2023
"Very fast and accurate. thank you."
mojtaba July 2023
"I love this app because it's help to writing skills all of students ♥️"
Tarisini July 2023
"This was exactly the mistake I was looking for, the wording dind´t sound right at first. Better than grammarly!"
Ente July 2023
"The immediate help that I received was reassuring and very satisfactory. Thanks."
priiiyanshuu July 2023
"this helps A LOT for my studies."
kathnunez02 June 2023
"Woow!! I would never have expected such precision! Thank you soooo much!!"
Berta June 2023
"Real Time Editor and not AI. Many Thanks."
Priya June 2023
"The very first thing excites me about Textranch is how much your editors care."
sepideh June 2023
"The fact that texts are checked by human editors rather than by AI, etc. I appreciate this!"
Анна June 2023
"Feel welcome, immediate response, high quality feedback"
martin.roy June 2023
"This is the best app that I have ever seen"
Burulai May 2023

Letter Dated on 1st September vs Letter Dated 1st September