"let to" vs "let for"

Question

"let to" vs "let for"

The phrases 'let to' and 'let for' are not directly comparable as they serve different purposes. 'Let to' is used in the context of renting out a property, while 'let for' is not a common phrase in English. It is more likely that 'let for' is a typo or a misunderstanding of the phrase 'let to'.

Last Updated: March 27, 2024

The phrase 'let to' is used when referring to the action of renting out a property to someone. It indicates the direction of the rental agreement.

Examples:

The landlord decided to let to a young couple.
She agreed to let to the new tenants for a year.
They are looking for a property to let to students.
He is considering whether to let to a family or a group of friends.
The real estate agent will let to the highest bidder.

Answer 1

let to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English in the context of renting out a property.

Answer 2

let for

This phrase is not a common or correct construction in English. It is likely a typo or a misunderstanding of the phrase 'let to'.

"let to" vs "let for"

let to

let for

Related Comparisons