"learned what is" vs "learned what was"

Question

"learned what is" vs "learned what was"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Learned what is' is used when referring to present knowledge or information, while 'learned what was' is used when talking about past knowledge or information.

Last Updated: March 30, 2024

This phrase is used when someone has acquired knowledge about something that is currently true or valid.

Examples:

I just learned what is causing the issue with the software.
She learned what is expected of her in the new role.

Alternatives:

learned what it is
learned what the situation is
learned what the problem is
learned what the reason is
learned what the truth is

This phrase is used when someone has acquired knowledge about something that was true or valid in the past.

Examples:

He learned what was causing the error in the previous version of the software.
She learned what was expected of her in her previous role.

Alternatives:

learned what it was
learned what the situation was
learned what the problem was
learned what the reason was
learned what the truth was

Answer 1

learned what is

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to present knowledge or information.

Answer 2

learned what was

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to past knowledge or information.

"learned what is" vs "learned what was"

learned what is

learned what was

Related Comparisons