"lack of novelty of" vs "lack of novelty on"

Question

"lack of novelty of" vs "lack of novelty on"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Lack of novelty on' is used when referring to a specific topic or subject, while 'lack of novelty of' is used when discussing the general absence of newness or originality in something.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

This phrase is used to describe the overall lack of new or original elements in a particular context.

Examples:

The movie suffered from a lack of novelty of plot twists.
The design showed a lack of novelty of ideas.
The product launch revealed a lack of novelty of features.

Alternatives:

lack of innovation of
absence of originality of
shortage of creativity of
dearth of freshness of
deficiency of uniqueness of

This phrase is used to indicate the absence of new or original ideas on a particular topic or subject.

Examples:

There is a lack of novelty on the current trends in fashion.
The article highlighted the lack of novelty on the topic of climate change.
The presentation suffered from a lack of novelty on the subject of artificial intelligence.

Alternatives:

lack of innovation on
absence of originality on
shortage of creativity on
dearth of freshness on
deficiency of uniqueness on

Answer 1

lack of novelty of

This phrase is correct when discussing the general absence of newness or originality in something.

Answer 2

lack of novelty on

This phrase is correct when referring to a specific topic or subject.

"lack of novelty of" vs "lack of novelty on"

lack of novelty of

lack of novelty on

Related Comparisons