"kind of a slacker" vs "kind of slacker"

Question

"kind of a slacker" vs "kind of slacker"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'Kind of a slacker' is more commonly used and emphasizes the idea that the person is somewhat of a slacker. On the other hand, 'kind of slacker' is less common and may sound a bit awkward because it lacks the article 'a'.

Last Updated: March 22, 2024

This phrase is used to describe someone who is somewhat lazy or not very motivated. The article 'a' is necessary before 'slacker' to make the phrase grammatically correct.

Examples:

He's kind of a slacker, but he still manages to get his work done.
She's not a full slacker, just kind of a slacker.
I wouldn't call him a slacker, just kind of a slacker.
Being kind of a slacker doesn't mean you can't succeed.
She's kind of a slacker, but she's really smart.

Alternatives:

sort of a slacker
a bit of a slacker
somewhat of a slacker
a little bit of a slacker
kind of lazy

This phrase is also used to describe someone who is somewhat lazy or not very motivated. However, it may sound a bit awkward because it lacks the article 'a' before 'slacker'.

Examples:

He's kind of slacker, but he still manages to get his work done.
She's not a full slacker, just kind of slacker.
I wouldn't call him a slacker, just kind of slacker.
Being kind of slacker doesn't mean you can't succeed.
She's kind of slacker, but she's really smart.

Alternatives:

sort of slacker
a bit of slacker
somewhat slacker
a little bit of slacker
kind of lazy

Answer 1

kind of a slacker

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

kind of slacker

This phrase is correct but less common in English.

"kind of a slacker" vs "kind of slacker"

kind of a slacker

kind of slacker

Related Comparisons