1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

"which would lead to" vs "killing all active"

These two phrases are not directly comparable as they serve different purposes. "Killing all active" seems to be a fragment of a sentence that lacks context, while "which would lead to" is a phrase used to introduce a consequence or result. They are not interchangeable in a sentence.

Last Updated: March 17, 2024

which would lead to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to introduce a consequence or result.

"Which would lead to" is used to explain the outcome or effect of a previous action or situation.

killing all active

This phrase is not a complete or commonly used construction in English. It lacks context and seems incomplete.

This phrase needs to be part of a complete sentence to convey a clear meaning. Without additional context, it is unclear and incomplete.

Related Comparisons

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!