"I've been in the city" vs "I've lived in the city"

Question

"I've been in the city" vs "I've lived in the city"

Both phrases are correct, but they convey slightly different meanings. 'I've been in the city' implies a temporary visit or stay, while 'I've lived in the city' suggests a more permanent or long-term residence. The choice between the two depends on the duration and nature of the experience in the city.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

This phrase is used to convey that you have visited or stayed in the city for a period of time, without specifying the duration or permanence of the experience.

Examples:

I've been in the city for a few days now.
She said she's been in the city before.

Alternatives:

I've visited the city.
I've spent time in the city.
I've been to the city.
I've stayed in the city.
I've traveled to the city.

This phrase is used to convey that you have resided in the city for a significant period of time, indicating a more permanent or long-term stay.

Examples:

I've lived in the city for ten years.
She said she's lived in the city all her life.

Alternatives:

I've resided in the city.
I've stayed in the city for a long time.
I've made the city my home.
I've been a resident of the city.
I've settled in the city.

Answer 1

I've been in the city

This phrase is correct and commonly used to indicate a temporary visit or stay in the city.

Answer 2

I've lived in the city

This phrase is correct and commonly used to indicate a more permanent or long-term residence in the city.

"I've been in the city" vs "I've lived in the city"

I've been in the city

I've lived in the city

Related Comparisons