I've amended in the system vs I amended in the system

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'I've amended in the system' is in the present perfect tense, indicating an action that was completed recently or has relevance to the present. 'I amended in the system' is in the simple past tense, indicating an action that was completed in the past. The choice between them depends on the specific timing you want to convey.

Last updated: March 22, 2024 • 2700 views

I've amended in the system

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English, especially when referring to an action that was completed recently or has relevance to the present.

This phrase is in the present perfect tense, indicating an action that was completed recently or has relevance to the present. It is used when you want to emphasize the connection between the past action of amending and the current situation in the system.

Examples:

I've amended the data in the system.
She's amended the report in the system.
They've amended the errors in the system.

Alternatives:

I have amended in the system
I have made amendments in the system
I have updated in the system
I have corrected in the system
I have modified in the system

I amended in the system

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English, especially when referring to an action that was completed in the past.

This phrase is in the simple past tense, indicating an action that was completed in the past. It is used when you want to focus on the completion of the amending process in the system without emphasizing its connection to the present.

Examples:

I amended the document in the system yesterday.
She amended the settings in the system last week.
They amended the contract in the system a month ago.

Show examples from the web [+]

As so many speakers in this debate have said, they must be constantly amended - the systems themselves, that is to say, rather than the values underpinning them.
4. Where appropriate, the Sirenac information system is amended in order to implement the abovementioned requirements.
If this proposal is adopted as amended, the system for the exercise of the Commission's implementing powers (or, potentially, the under the new Constitution, delegated legislative powers) will be subject to far better Parliamentary scrutiny.
Directive 2005/56/EC should also be amended in order to ensure that communication between registers is carried out through the system of interconnection of registers.
Directive 2005/56/EC should be amended in order to ensure that communication between registers is carried out through the system of interconnection of registers.
The concerns expressed in the Court's Opinion No 2/2006 on the added complexity of the amended system of the European Communities' own resources were not taken into account in Decision 2007/436/EC, Euratom.
In order to ensure the smooth transition from the current control system to the amended system, this Regulation should apply from 1 January 2014.
Following the letter of formal notice, the Irish authorities amended the tax system.
(4) Furthermore, existing rules should be amended in order to improve or clarify the procedure for registration. In addition, certain procedural points should be amended without changing the substance of the system.
In the light of experience gained in the application of that Regulation, some of the current conditions need to be amended in order to simplify and clarify the system.
The notified body must assess the proposed changes and decide whether the amended quality system will still satisfy the requirements referred to in 4.2 or whether a reassessment is required.
The notified body shall evaluate any modifications proposed and decide whether the amended quality management system will still satisfy the requirements of point 5.2 or whether a re-assessment is required.
The notified body shall evaluate any modifications proposed and decide whether the amended quality management system will still satisfy the requirements of point 5.2 or whether a re-assessment is required.
The Recommendation of 26 June 2009 of the Customs Cooperation Council amended the Harmonised System nomenclature.
Collecting systems described in paragraph 1 shall satisfy the requirements of Annex I (A). These requirements may be amended in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 18.
The notified body must assess the proposed changes and decide whether the amended quality system will still satisfy the requirements referred to in 3.2 or whether a reassessment is required.
The notified body shall evaluate the modifications proposed and decide whether the amended quality system will still satisfy the requirements referred to in paragraph 3.2 or whether a reassessment is required.
The notified body must evaluate the modifications proposed and decide whether the amended quality system will still satisfy the requirements referred to in paragraph 3.2 or whether a re-assessment is required.
The notified body must evaluate the modifications proposed and decide whether the amended quality system will still satisfy the requirements referred to in paragraph 3.2 or whether a reassessment is required.
The notified body shall evaluate the modifications proposed and decide whether the amended quality management system will still satisfy the requirements referenced in point 5.2 or whether a re-assessment is required.

Alternatives:

I made amendments in the system
I updated in the system
I corrected in the system
I modified in the system
I changed in the system

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9).

"Thank you!"
Sachi Nakama July 2024
"I have literally been through chat, PI, claude, bard and bing and I got conflicting answers! Thank you! Human intelligence reigns!"
Retha July 2024
"Faster than AI"
CYNTHIA December 2023
"This was very helpful and I personally think this site is the best."
Kaden October 2023
"It was extremely thorough and very helpful!"
imperialelisa October 2023
"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"
Zubair Alam October 2023
"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."
Selena October 2023
"Without textranch I would be stuck!"
宏祐 October 2023
"Accuracy and fast response. Personal comments from editor. Thank you."
Clh September 2023
"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"
Arturo September 2023
"The fact that you can get reliable fast feedback on your texts."
Vinicius Antonio August 2023
"you guys are better than grammarly i'm being honest here"
ordinary July 2023
"OMG! This is really good than any other text correction tools I've used so far. Highly recommend this."
Vehan July 2023
"Very fast and accurate. thank you."
mojtaba July 2023
"I love this app because it's help to writing skills all of students ♥️"
Tarisini July 2023
"This was exactly the mistake I was looking for, the wording dind´t sound right at first. Better than grammarly!"
Ente July 2023
"The immediate help that I received was reassuring and very satisfactory. Thanks."
priiiyanshuu July 2023
"this helps A LOT for my studies."
kathnunez02 June 2023
"Woow!! I would never have expected such precision! Thank you soooo much!!"
Berta June 2023
"Real Time Editor and not AI. Many Thanks."
Priya June 2023
"The very first thing excites me about Textranch is how much your editors care."
sepideh June 2023
"The fact that texts are checked by human editors rather than by AI, etc. I appreciate this!"
Анна June 2023
"Feel welcome, immediate response, high quality feedback"
martin.roy June 2023
"This is the best app that I have ever seen"
Burulai May 2023

I've amended in the system vs I amended in the system