I've amended in the system vs I amended in the system

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'I've amended in the system' is in the present perfect tense, indicating an action that was completed recently or has relevance to the present. 'I amended in the system' is in the simple past tense, indicating an action that was completed in the past. The choice between them depends on the specific timing you want to convey.

Last updated: March 22, 2024 • 2842 views

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English, especially when referring to an action that was completed recently or has relevance to the present.

"I've amended in the system"

This phrase is in the present perfect tense, indicating an action that was completed recently or has relevance to the present. It is used when you want to emphasize the connection between the past action of amending and the current situation in the system.

Examples:

I've amended the data in the system.
She's amended the report in the system.
They've amended the errors in the system.

Alternatives:

I have amended in the system
I have made amendments in the system
I have updated in the system
I have corrected in the system
I have modified in the system

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English, especially when referring to an action that was completed in the past.

"I amended in the system"

This phrase is in the simple past tense, indicating an action that was completed in the past. It is used when you want to focus on the completion of the amending process in the system without emphasizing its connection to the present.

Examples:

I amended the document in the system yesterday.
She amended the settings in the system last week.
They amended the contract in the system a month ago.

Show examples from the web [+]

As so many speakers in this debate have said, they must be constantly amended - the systems themselves, that is to say, rather than the values underpinning them.
4. Where appropriate, the Sirenac information system is amended in order to implement the abovementioned requirements.
If this proposal is adopted as amended, the system for the exercise of the Commission's implementing powers (or, potentially, the under the new Constitution, delegated legislative powers) will be subject to far better Parliamentary scrutiny.
Directive 2005/56/EC should also be amended in order to ensure that communication between registers is carried out through the system of interconnection of registers.
Directive 2005/56/EC should be amended in order to ensure that communication between registers is carried out through the system of interconnection of registers.
The concerns expressed in the Court's Opinion No 2/2006 on the added complexity of the amended system of the European Communities' own resources were not taken into account in Decision 2007/436/EC, Euratom.
In order to ensure the smooth transition from the current control system to the amended system, this Regulation should apply from 1 January 2014.
Following the letter of formal notice, the Irish authorities amended the tax system.
(4) Furthermore, existing rules should be amended in order to improve or clarify the procedure for registration. In addition, certain procedural points should be amended without changing the substance of the system.
In the light of experience gained in the application of that Regulation, some of the current conditions need to be amended in order to simplify and clarify the system.
The notified body must assess the proposed changes and decide whether the amended quality system will still satisfy the requirements referred to in 4.2 or whether a reassessment is required.
The notified body shall evaluate any modifications proposed and decide whether the amended quality management system will still satisfy the requirements of point 5.2 or whether a re-assessment is required.
The notified body shall evaluate any modifications proposed and decide whether the amended quality management system will still satisfy the requirements of point 5.2 or whether a re-assessment is required.
The Recommendation of 26 June 2009 of the Customs Cooperation Council amended the Harmonised System nomenclature.
Collecting systems described in paragraph 1 shall satisfy the requirements of Annex I (A). These requirements may be amended in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 18.
The notified body must assess the proposed changes and decide whether the amended quality system will still satisfy the requirements referred to in 3.2 or whether a reassessment is required.
The notified body shall evaluate the modifications proposed and decide whether the amended quality system will still satisfy the requirements referred to in paragraph 3.2 or whether a reassessment is required.
The notified body must evaluate the modifications proposed and decide whether the amended quality system will still satisfy the requirements referred to in paragraph 3.2 or whether a re-assessment is required.
The notified body must evaluate the modifications proposed and decide whether the amended quality system will still satisfy the requirements referred to in paragraph 3.2 or whether a reassessment is required.
The notified body shall evaluate the modifications proposed and decide whether the amended quality management system will still satisfy the requirements referenced in point 5.2 or whether a re-assessment is required.

Alternatives:

I made amendments in the system
I updated in the system
I corrected in the system
I modified in the system
I changed in the system

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

Emails and short texts
Proofreading & editing
Ready in 5-10 minutes

SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

Documents of any type (*.docx)
Advanced & Premium editing
Ready in as little as 4 hours

UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

Personalized answers to your language questions
Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
Ready in 24 hours

ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

3. Receive Your Polished Text

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Zubair
from Bangladesh

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Arturo
from Mexico

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Selena
from USA

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Ifiok
from Nigeria

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Wilson
from France

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Susan
from Germany

I've amended in the system vs I amended in the system