"It's been two to three years since we saw them." vs "It's been two, three years since we saw them."

Question

"It's been two to three years since we saw them." vs "It's been two, three years since we saw them."

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. The first phrase 'it's been two, three years since we saw them.' is more informal and conversational, while the second phrase 'it's been two to three years since we saw them.' is more formal and precise. The choice between them depends on the level of formality you want to convey.

Last Updated: March 25, 2024

This phrase is more formal and precise, indicating a specific range of time. It is suitable for written English or formal speech.

Alternatives:

it's been between two and three years since we saw them.
it's been approximately two to three years since we saw them.

This phrase is commonly used in spoken English to indicate an approximate range of time. The comma between 'two' and 'three' indicates a pause in speech.

Alternatives:

it's been two or three years since we saw them.
it's been about two or three years since we saw them.

Answer 1

It's been two to three years since we saw them.

This phrase is correct in formal contexts where precision is required.

Answer 2

It's been two, three years since we saw them.

This phrase is correct in informal and conversational contexts.

"It's been two to three years since we saw them." vs "It's been two, three years since we saw them."

It's been two to three years since we saw them.

It's been two, three years since we saw them.

Related Comparisons