"was suspicious" vs "it was suspicious"

Question

"was suspicious" vs "it was suspicious"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "It was suspicious" is a complete sentence where the subject 'it' is included, while "was suspicious" is a fragment that can be part of a larger sentence where the subject is implied.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

This phrase is a fragment that can be used in a sentence where the subject is understood from the context. It is often used in informal or spoken English to express doubt or uncertainty.

Alternatives:

I thought it was suspicious.
She seemed suspicious.
He looked suspicious.
They appeared suspicious.
The circumstances felt suspicious.

This phrase is a complete sentence where 'it' is the subject and 'was suspicious' is the predicate. It is used to describe a situation or behavior that seemed questionable or doubtful.

Examples:

It was suspicious that he suddenly left without saying a word.
It was suspicious how quickly she changed her story.
It was suspicious that the door was left unlocked.
It was suspicious that he refused to answer any questions.
It was suspicious that the document went missing.

Alternatives:

The situation was suspicious.
His behavior seemed suspicious.
There were suspicious circumstances.
The incident raised suspicions.
The evidence pointed to suspicious activity.

Answer 1

was suspicious

This phrase is correct when used as part of a larger sentence where the subject is implied.

Answer 2

it was suspicious

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"was suspicious" vs "it was suspicious"

was suspicious

it was suspicious

Related Comparisons