TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

it was restored vs I'm shell to take part

The two phrases are not comparable as they are completely different and do not make sense in the same context. 'It was restored' is a correct and commonly used phrase to indicate that something was repaired or returned to its original state. 'I'm shell to take part' does not make sense in English and is not a valid phrase.

Last updated: March 08, 2024

it was restored

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate that something was repaired or returned to its original state.

This phrase is used to describe the action of restoring something to its previous condition or state.

Examples:

  • The old house was restored to its former glory.
  • The painting was restored by a professional conservator.

I'm shell to take part

This phrase does not make sense in English and is not a valid expression.

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!