"It was a miracle for me" vs "It was a miracle to me"

Question

"It was a miracle for me" vs "It was a miracle to me"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'It was a miracle for me' implies that the miracle benefited the speaker in some way, while 'It was a miracle to me' suggests that the speaker was amazed or surprised by the miracle.

Last Updated: March 25, 2024

This phrase is used when the speaker wants to express that the miracle had a positive impact or benefit for them.

Examples:

Finding that lost ring was a miracle for me.
Getting a job offer right after graduation was a miracle for me.

Alternatives:

it was a miracle to me
it felt like a miracle to me
it seemed like a miracle for me
it was miraculous for me
it was like a miracle for me

This phrase is used when the speaker wants to convey their amazement or surprise at the miracle.

Examples:

The way she survived that accident was a miracle to me.
His quick recovery was a miracle to me.

Alternatives:

it was a miracle for me
it felt like a miracle to me
it seemed like a miracle to me
it was miraculous to me
it was like a miracle to me

Answer 1

It was a miracle for me

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

It was a miracle to me

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"It was a miracle for me" vs "It was a miracle to me"

It was a miracle for me

It was a miracle to me

Related Comparisons