"it must be posible treating" vs "it must be posible to treat"

Question

"it must be posible treating" vs "it must be posible to treat"

Both phrases are correct, but they have slightly different meanings. 'It must be possible to treat' implies that treatment is necessary or required, while 'It must be possible treating' suggests that the act of treating is feasible or achievable. The choice between the two depends on the intended meaning in the context.

Last Updated: March 25, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate that the act of treating is possible or achievable.

Examples:

It must be possible treating the symptoms without causing side effects.
For the project to be successful, it must be possible treating all the variables involved.
In order to prevent complications, it must be possible treating the condition early.

Alternatives:

It must be possible to treat
It must be feasible treating
It must be achievable treating
It must be necessary treating
It must be essential treating

This phrase is used to express the necessity or requirement for a treatment to be feasible or achievable.

Examples:

It must be possible to treat this disease effectively.
For the plan to succeed, it must be possible to treat all the issues that arise.
In order to save the patient, it must be possible to treat the infection quickly.

Alternatives:

It must be possible to address
It must be feasible to treat
It must be achievable to treat
It must be necessary to treat
It must be essential to treat

Answer 1

it must be posible treating

This phrase is correct and can be used to suggest the feasibility or achievability of treating.

Answer 2

it must be posible to treat

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"it must be posible treating" vs "it must be posible to treat"

it must be posible treating

it must be posible to treat

Related Comparisons