TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

it is easy to show that vs solve for when

These two phrases are not directly comparable as they serve different purposes. 'It is easy to show that' is used to introduce a statement or proof, while 'solve for when' is used to indicate finding a specific value or condition. They are used in different contexts and cannot be interchanged.

Last updated: March 15, 2024 • 730 views

it is easy to show that

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to introduce a statement or proof.

This phrase is typically used at the beginning of a sentence to indicate that what follows can be easily demonstrated or proven.

Examples:

  • It is easy to show that the sum of two even numbers is always even.
  • It is easy to show that the function is continuous at x = 0.
  • Feb 24, 2015 ... It is easy to show that the function M(r)=integral_0 to 2pi |1+r exp(ix)|^p dx, where p>0, is an increasing function for r>=1. What about 0<r<1?
  • Sep 30, 2004 ... It is easy to show that at least one-half of the integers a, 1 ≤ a ≤ n, are witnesses for n, for each odd composite n. So can we find a witness ...
  • and it is easy to show that Z ⊴ GLn(R) (make sure students show this). Every element of Z actually commutes with every element of GLn(R). The intersection ...
  • It is easy to show that un divides unm (see primitive part of a Fibonacci number), so for un to be a prime, the subscript must either be 4 (because u2=1) or a prime  ...

solve for when

This phrase is not a common or correct construction in English. It does not convey a clear meaning.

  • How do I solve for when an object is going to come back to the ground when given the initial velocity and initial height from which the object ...
  • How do I solve for when an object is going to come back to the ground when given the initial velocity and initial height from which the object.
  • The denominator of 2x-3 is negative throughout this boundary so we only have to solve for when the denominator is negative and do not have to solve for when ...
  • Mar 31, 2015 ... Given the function f(x)=2 + 5 x solve for when f(−x)? Follow. 1 answer. Report Abuse. Are you sure you want to delete this answer? Yes No ...

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!