Which one is correct?
"it could be a coincidence" or "It can't be coincidence"?

Question

Which one is correct?
"it could be a coincidence" or "It can't be coincidence"?

TextRanch: The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

One of our experts will correct your English.

100% Human-Powered Editing!

This phrase is used to suggest that there is a chance that a situation or event is indeed a coincidence.

Examples:

It could be a coincidence that they both wore the same color to the party.
I think it could be a coincidence that we bumped into each other at the store.

Alternatives:

It might be a coincidence
It's possible that it's a coincidence

This phrase is used to emphasize the speaker's conviction that a situation or event is not a coincidence.

Examples:

Given the evidence, it can't be coincidence that they arrived at the same conclusion.
It can't be coincidence that they both chose the same obscure book for their book club.

Alternatives:

It must be intentional
It's not a coincidence

Both phrases are correct, but they convey different meanings. 'It can't be coincidence' implies a strong belief that something is not a coincidence, while 'It could be a coincidence' suggests a possibility that something is indeed a coincidence.

Last Updated: March 24, 2024