"issued an order to" vs "issue an order to"

Question

"issued an order to" vs "issue an order to"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Issued an order to' is past tense and is used when referring to a completed action in the past. 'Issue an order to' is present tense and is used when talking about a current or future action.

Last Updated: April 01, 2024

This phrase is used to describe the action of giving a directive or command in the past. It indicates that the order has already been given and executed.

Examples:

The general issued an order to retreat.
The manager issued an order to stop all production.
The president issued an order to deploy troops.
The judge issued an order to freeze the assets.
The captain issued an order to abandon ship.

Alternatives:

gave an order to
commanded an order to
directed an order to
ordered to
instructed to

This phrase is used to describe the action of giving a directive or command in the present or future. It indicates that the order is being given or will be given.

Examples:

The manager will issue an order to start the project.
The president is going to issue an order to investigate the matter.
The committee is discussing whether to issue an order to cease operations.
The board of directors may issue an order to restructure the company.
The supervisor needs to issue an order to review the safety procedures.

Alternatives:

give an order to
command an order to
direct an order to
order to
instruct to

Answer 1

issued an order to

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to a completed action in the past.

Answer 2

issue an order to

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to a current or future action.

"issued an order to" vs "issue an order to"

issued an order to

issue an order to

Related Comparisons