"not set in" vs "is not set in"

Question

"not set in" vs "is not set in"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Is not set in" is used when emphasizing that something is not established or fixed in a particular place or situation. On the other hand, "not set in" is used to negate the action of setting something in a specific place or situation.

Last Updated: March 17, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate the absence of setting or placing something in a particular context. It negates the action of establishing or fixing in a specific situation.

Examples:

The painting is not set in a frame yet.
The furniture is not set in place properly.
The scene is not set in the final location.
The plan is not set in motion until approval is received.
The project is not set in stone and can be modified.

Alternatives:

not placed in
not established in
not fixed in
not located in
not situated in

This phrase is used to indicate that something is not placed or established in a specific context. It emphasizes the absence of setting or fixing in a particular situation.

Examples:

The story is not set in a specific time period.
The rules are not set in stone and can be changed if necessary.
The characters are not set in their ways and are open to new ideas.
The boundaries are not set in concrete and can be adjusted as needed.
The plans are not set in motion until further notice.

Alternatives:

is not established in
is not fixed in
is not located in
is not placed in
is not situated in

Answer 1

not set in

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to negate the action of setting something in a specific place or situation.

Answer 2

is not set in

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to emphasize that something is not established or fixed in a particular place or situation.

"not set in" vs "is not set in"

not set in

is not set in

Related Comparisons