"is likely to take place" vs "is most likely to take place"

Question

"is likely to take place" vs "is most likely to take place"

Both phrases are correct, but they convey slightly different levels of certainty. 'Is most likely to take place' emphasizes a higher degree of probability compared to 'is likely to take place.' The choice between them depends on the context and the desired level of certainty.

Last Updated: March 21, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate a reasonable probability of an event occurring. It suggests a likelihood without emphasizing an extremely high probability.

Examples:

The project is likely to take place next month.
The event is likely to take place in the evening.
The changes are likely to take place gradually over time.

Alternatives:

is probable to take place
is expected to take place
is anticipated to take place
is foreseeable to take place
is quite likely to take place

This phrase is used to indicate a very high probability of an event occurring. It emphasizes the strong likelihood of the event taking place.

Examples:

The meeting is most likely to take place in the conference room.
She is most likely to win the competition with her exceptional skills.
The concert is most likely to take place outdoors due to the good weather forecast.

Alternatives:

is highly likely to take place
is very likely to take place
is extremely likely to take place
is almost certain to take place
is almost sure to take place

Answer 1

is likely to take place

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to express a moderate probability of something happening.

Answer 2

is most likely to take place

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to express a high probability of something happening.

"is likely to take place" vs "is most likely to take place"

is likely to take place

is most likely to take place

Related Comparisons