is explained by vs is due to

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Is explained by' is used to provide an explanation or reason for something, while 'is due to' is used to indicate a cause or reason for a particular situation or outcome.

Last updated: March 20, 2024 • 1439 views

is explained by

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to provide an explanation or reason for something.

Use 'is explained by' when you want to give an explanation or reason for a particular phenomenon, event, or situation.

Examples:

The increase in sales is explained by the new marketing strategy.
The success of the project is explained by the team's hard work and dedication.

Show examples from the web [+]

This increase is explained by the high price elasticity of the TA.
This is explained by the fact that some relatively small non-cooperating Union producers did not submit production information.
The increase is explained by the wider scope of activities compared to the previous programmes, as well as the new policy objectives in this area (see table in annex).
This fact, which apparently conflicts with the increase in licences, is explained by the need of fishing vessels to follow concentrations and movements of stocks, which result in their frequently moving in and out of Cape Verde's territorial waters.
Its particular format is explained by its complex remit, which is rooted in a long-term perspective, making provision for a wide-ranging discussion of all possible options, not excluding possible Treaty changes.
Such level of mark-up is explained by the added value they generate in the Community (specific costs related to design, sourcing R & D, etc.), but also by their significant expenses related to marketing and brand.
This increase is explained by the accession of three new Member States.
That different situation is explained by the fact that Turkey is an enlargement applicant country, and therefore benefits from specific bilateral cooperation with the EU.
This extremely small increase is explained by a reduction of approximately 2% in the volume of expenditure laid down for the European Union of 15.
Certain importers claimed that the decrease of the import prices is explained by changes in the product-mix.
This is explained by the fact that new Union producers entered the market in that period.
This is explained by increasing financing needs from SOEs, a sharp increase in households' redemption of savings certificates, and persisting financial market stress.
On the revenue side, only 0,5 percentage point is explained by an increase in the tax ratio, which is mainly due to an expected improvement in tax collection.
This non-linearity is explained by a concentration dependent decrease of binding to plasma proteins which leads to a respective increase in distribution and elimination.
This sudden surge of dumped imports is explained by a dramatic decrease of the corresponding prices during the same period.
This is explained by the particularly lucrative nature of these activities and by the lower risk compared with other lucrative criminal activities.
The decrease in the capacity utilisation rate during the IP compared to the preceding years is explained by the sudden drop in demand for the product concerned in the IP.
This increase is explained by the strong increase in the deficit and the negative GDP growth.
The increase in administrative expenses of EUR 32 million compared to 2008 is explained by an increase in administrative expenses related to the implementation of EDF contracts.
This variance is explained by the following items which would not have been a liability in the event of the liquidation of IFB:

Alternatives:

is accounted for by
is clarified by
is elucidated by
is rationalized by
is justified by

is due to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate a cause or reason for a particular situation or outcome.

Use 'is due to' to explain the cause or reason behind a specific result, effect, or condition.