"involved" vs "was involved"

Question

"involved" vs "was involved"

Both "involved" and "was involved" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Involved" is the past participle form of the verb "involve" and can be used on its own or with auxiliary verbs like "has" or "had." On the other hand, "was involved" is the past tense of the verb "involve" combined with the auxiliary verb "was." The choice between the two depends on the sentence structure and the tense being used.

Last Updated: March 28, 2024

You can use "involved" as a past participle in sentences like "She has been involved in the project for a long time."

Examples:

He was deeply involved in the decision-making process.
The students were actively involved in the school play.
The company has been involved in several charitable activities.
She seemed involved in her thoughts.
The team is involved in a heated debate.

Alternatives:

has been involved
had been involved
is involved
being involved
getting involved

You can use "was involved" in past tense sentences like "He was involved in the project last year."

Examples:

She was involved in the accident.
He was involved in a heated argument.
They were involved in the planning process.
The company was involved in a legal dispute.
I was involved in the decision-making.

Alternatives:

had been involved
got involved
became involved
participated
took part

Answer 1

involved

This is correct. "Involved" is the past participle form of the verb "involve" and can be used on its own or with auxiliary verbs like "has" or "had."

Answer 2

was involved

This is correct. "Was involved" is the past tense of the verb "involve" combined with the auxiliary verb "was."

"involved" vs "was involved"

involved

was involved

Related Comparisons