included for vs included to

Both "included for" and "included to" are not commonly used phrases in English. The preposition typically used after "included" is "in". Therefore, neither of the provided phrases is correct or commonly used in English.

Last updated: March 26, 2024 • 1250 views

This phrase is not correct or commonly used in English.

"included for"

The preposition typically used after "included" is "in". Therefore, it is more appropriate to say "included in" when referring to something that is part of a group or set.

Show examples from the web [+]

Tsveraba and Khaburdania are not included for a bonus.
This increase concerns mainly Temporary Agents, Contractual Agents and MEP's assistants, the latter being included for the first time in the scheme.
Number of permanent observation plots, which are to be included for the increment measurements (Form 2a)
Number of permanent observation plots, which are to be included for the deposition measurements (Form 2a)
The total amount of tangible fixed assets included for the Delegations at 31 December 2003 is EUR 57.7 million.
The entries in the Annex to this Directive are included for the first time in Annex I to Directive 67/548/EEC.
Number of permanent observation plots, which are to be included for the meteorological measurements (Form 2a)
number of permanent observation plots, which are to be included for the measurements of soil solution (form 2a)
An appropriate amount is included for disabled visitors.
An appropriate amount is included for disabled visitors.
This test is included for conformity of production purposes.
Special provisions should be included for information and communication activities on EGF cases and outcomes.
A definition should be included for this new concept.
2) The euro area is included for information only.
3) The euro area average is included for information only.
The euro area average is included for information only.
3) The euro area average is included for information only.
I think that measures specifically aimed at this can be included for every macro-region in Europe.
I am sorry that provision has not been included for the creation of a European regulatory mechanism.
Add any additional paths to be included for indexing.

Alternatives:

included in
included with
included on
included among
included within

This phrase is not correct or commonly used in English.

"included to"

The preposition typically used after "included" is "in". Therefore, it is more appropriate to say "included in" when referring to something that is part of a group or set.

Show examples from the web [+]

The quiz section is included to check your understanding of the photography concepts.
A storage bag is included to protect the hammock when stored and prevent fading.
While the gameplay is mostly action-oriented, several puzzles are included to challenge the player.
Mounting fixings are included to attach the whiteboard to the wall.
It was included to set a standard.
They must be included to address the most pressing problem in Europe: the dramatic and constantly rising unemployment rates in European countries.
Woven belt holster... is included to secure PRO-POINTER to standard size belts.
Scraper included to remove cut garlic.
There are many other features included to further enhance your experience.
Mobile telephone included to communicate with your butler throughout the day.
All other services are included to provide a pleasant and relaxing stay.
A printed manual and sample programs are included to get you started.
Wind fairing is included to help airflow over your cargo.
Forum has been included to have spiritual discussions.
However bias adjustment and test points are included to get the optimum performance from a wide range of output valves.
A heat-sealed valve bag is included to ensure the freshest coffee.
Furthermore, a game is included to lead visitors to elaborate a personalized photo album with objects of the app that he has reached to find.
A shell script wrapper is included to make starting, stopping, and restarting the server as simple as possible.
The active comparator groups were included to check that the study was able to measure the effectiveness of medicines in treating depression.
resistors included to eliminate confusing your car computer

Alternatives:

included in
included with
included on
included among
included within

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

Emails and short texts
Proofreading & editing
Ready in 5-10 minutes

SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

Documents of any type (*.docx)
Advanced & Premium editing
Ready in as little as 4 hours

UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

Personalized answers to your language questions
Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
Ready in 24 hours

ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

3. Receive Your Polished Text

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Zubair
from Bangladesh

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Arturo
from Mexico

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Selena
from USA

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Ifiok
from Nigeria

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Wilson
from France

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Susan
from Germany

included for vs included to

"included for"

"included to"

Related Comparisons

2. Submit Your Text

3. Receive Your Polished Text