TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

in year 2017 vs in the year 2017

Both 'in year 2017' and 'in the year 2017' are not correct. The correct phrase is 'in 2017.' The use of 'the' before the year is unnecessary.

Last updated: March 31, 2024 • 8056 views

in year 2017

This phrase is not correct in English.

The correct way to express this is 'in 2017.'
  • Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2073 [2] sets the amounts made available to the Member States for reimbursement to the final recipients in financial year 2017.
  • As a major compromise, we suggest that the possibility of liberalisation in the years 2017-2022 be considered, for the Fifteen and the EU as a whole respectively.
  • By way of derogation from paragraph 1, the Member State and the Commission may agree not to organise an annual review meeting for a programme in years other than 2017 and 2019.
  • The Member State and the Commission should however be able to agree not to organise the meeting in years other than 2017 and 2019 in order to avoid an unnecessary administrative burden.
  • Provision of the data referred to in column Number of basic units (N) is optional in the years 2015-2017 for codes 10300-10319.
  • Unless funding is provided after 2013 (when FP7 ends) only projects for which a grant agreement has been signed at the latest by 31 December 2013 shall continue in the years 2014-2017.
  • Provision of the data referred to in codes 3031-3033 is optional in the years 2015-2017 for those Member States who used in the past the possibility under Article 3 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 385/2012 [9].
  • designating the European Capital of Culture for the year 2017 in Denmark and in Cyprus and the European Capital of Culture for the year 2018 in Malta
  • Scale up public education provision to 190000 Syrian refugees at primary and secondary level in the school year 2016-2017, while safeguarding quality of education
  • In the years 2015, 2017 and 2019, for pigs, bovines under one year of age, pig meat and bovine meat.
  • The required adjustment should be spread in equal proportions over the years 2017-2020.
  • The contribution coefficients for delivery years 2017, 2018 and 2019 were calculated using the scenarios in RTE's Generation Adequacy Report, based on a large number of statistical series.
  • The uptake of such quota during 2016 should be considered when setting fishing opportunities for the year 2017.
  • For all other Member States, the first opportunity to reduce the control rate starts only as from claim year 2017.
  • For claim year 2017 Member States may decide to revise all their measures adopted pursuant to Article 52 of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 targeting the milk and milk products sector.
  • The information referred to in the first subparagraph shall be made available in accordance with the Annex and shall cover the years 2017, 2018 and 2019.
  • The adjustments required shall be spread in equal proportions over the years 2017-2020 and the corresponding ceilings of the MFF shall be modified accordingly.
  • Member States shall ensure that their data collection arrangements allow the data to be reported according to the content and format defined in the Annex for the reporting year 2017 at the latest.
  • For the year 2017 the full amount of the quotas shall apply, irrespective of the date of entry into force or provisional application of the Protocol.
  • In view of the changes provided for in this Regulation, Bulgaria, Denmark and Austria should be requested to revise their respective selection plans for the accounting year 2017.

Alternatives:

  • in 2017

in the year 2017

This phrase is not correct in English.

The correct way to express this is 'in 2017.'

Alternatives:

  • in 2017

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!