TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

in each of the technical proposal criteria vs in each of the technical proposal criterion

The correct phrase is 'in each of the technical proposal criteria.' The word 'criteria' is the plural form of 'criterion,' so it should be used when referring to multiple aspects or standards. 'Criterion' is the singular form and should be used when referring to a single aspect or standard.

Last updated: March 30, 2024 • 430 views

in each of the technical proposal criteria

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used when referring to multiple aspects or standards that are part of the technical proposal evaluation process.
  • Manifest error of assessment of the quality of the technical proposal of the successful bid.
  • Manifest error of assessment of the quality of the technical proposal submitted by the ITAK consortium, insofar as the evaluation committee considered that a proposal submitted by three administrations (tax and customs) of as many as three EU Member States was insufficient and technically inadequate.
  • For each of the technical issues mentioned above one or more specific service contracts will be signed.
  • To this end, all of the technical and safety rules in force in each Member State should be classified under three groups and the results of this classification presented in a reference document.
  • This report shall, in the light of the situation existing in each Member State and of the technical developments that have taken place, deal particularly with the question of the time limit set in Article 6 (1).
  • The Commission has not adequately justified the technical proposals presented from a scientific point of view.
  • We are familiar with all the technical proposals.
  • 44, table 4,1, of the Technical Annex.
  • Only the most relevant divisions or branches of the Technical Secretariat will be invited to send resource persons.
  • A strong transparency during the process of endorsement of the technical standards is needed.
  • The current version of the technical measures allows for this provision.
  • Description of the technical and financial assistance and capacity building resources
  • This work is intended to facilitate engagement of the Technical Secretariat with the scientific community.
  • All relevant parts of the technical documentation shall be annexed to the certificate.
  • This would enable efficient synergies between the experts of the Technical Working Group and the Committee.
  • Description of the technical status of administrative boundaries.
  • The calculated braking performance shall be part of the technical documentation specified in clause 4.2.12.
  • Elements of the technical file relating to conditions and limits of use and instructions for maintenance.
  • The nature of the technical modification shall be clearly explained in the certification referred to in paragraph 1.
  • States Parties receive assurances on the readiness of the Technical Secretariat to conduct investigations of alleged use and challenge inspections.

Alternatives:

  • in each of the technical proposal criteria
  • within the technical proposal criteria
  • across the technical proposal criteria
  • among the technical proposal criteria
  • throughout the technical proposal criteria

in each of the technical proposal criterion

This phrase is incorrect. 'Criterion' is the singular form, so it should be 'in each of the technical proposal criteria' when referring to multiple aspects or standards.

  • Manifest error of assessment of the quality of the technical proposal of the successful bid.
  • Manifest error of assessment of the quality of the technical proposal submitted by the ITAK consortium, insofar as the evaluation committee considered that a proposal submitted by three administrations (tax and customs) of as many as three EU Member States was insufficient and technically inadequate.
  • For each of the technical issues mentioned above one or more specific service contracts will be signed.
  • To this end, all of the technical and safety rules in force in each Member State should be classified under three groups and the results of this classification presented in a reference document.
  • This report shall, in the light of the situation existing in each Member State and of the technical developments that have taken place, deal particularly with the question of the time limit set in Article 6 (1).
  • The Commission has not adequately justified the technical proposals presented from a scientific point of view.
  • We are familiar with all the technical proposals.
  • 44, table 4,1, of the Technical Annex.
  • Only the most relevant divisions or branches of the Technical Secretariat will be invited to send resource persons.
  • A strong transparency during the process of endorsement of the technical standards is needed.
  • The current version of the technical measures allows for this provision.
  • Description of the technical and financial assistance and capacity building resources
  • This work is intended to facilitate engagement of the Technical Secretariat with the scientific community.
  • All relevant parts of the technical documentation shall be annexed to the certificate.
  • This would enable efficient synergies between the experts of the Technical Working Group and the Committee.
  • Description of the technical status of administrative boundaries.
  • The calculated braking performance shall be part of the technical documentation specified in clause 4.2.12.
  • Elements of the technical file relating to conditions and limits of use and instructions for maintenance.
  • The nature of the technical modification shall be clearly explained in the certification referred to in paragraph 1.
  • States Parties receive assurances on the readiness of the Technical Secretariat to conduct investigations of alleged use and challenge inspections.

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!