"in contrast it was" vs "in contrast it was all"

Question

"in contrast it was" vs "in contrast it was all"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'In contrast it was' is used to introduce a contrasting idea or situation, while 'in contrast it was all' is used to emphasize that everything was different or unexpected in comparison to something else.

Last Updated: March 21, 2024

This phrase is used to highlight a difference or opposition between two things or ideas. It is often followed by an explanation or description of the contrasting element.

Examples:

She was always cheerful; in contrast, he was always serious.
The first book was a bestseller; in contrast, the second one barely sold any copies.

Alternatives:

on the other hand, it was
however, it was
conversely, it was
in comparison, it was
while it was

This phrase is used to stress that the entirety of a situation or context was different or surprising when compared to another situation. It adds emphasis to the contrast being made.

Examples:

The first performance was mediocre, but in contrast, it was all a spectacular success.
She thought she knew the truth, but in contrast, it was all a lie.

Alternatives:

completely different from
entirely unexpected compared to
totally contrary to
wholly distinct from
utterly divergent from

Answer 1

in contrast it was

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to introduce a contrasting idea or situation.

Answer 2

in contrast it was all

This phrase is correct and is used to emphasize that everything was different or unexpected in comparison to something else.

"in contrast it was" vs "in contrast it was all"

in contrast it was

in contrast it was all

Related Comparisons