🎁 A holiday package to celebrate the season! Click here and shop now!

TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

in CI=95% vs at CI=95%.

Both phrases are not correct as they are missing a key element. The correct way to express this concept is 'with a confidence interval of 95%.'

Last updated: March 17, 2024 • 695 views

in CI=95%

This phrase is not correct in English.

The correct way to express this concept is 'with a confidence interval of 95%.'
  • Aug 29, 2011 ... ... the strongest predictor of EOV (odds ratio, 1.39 for each 1.0-L · min(-1) · m(-2) decrement in CI; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.70; P=0.001).
  • Aug 29, 2011 ... ... the strongest predictor of EOV (odds ratio, 1.39 for each 1.0-L · min−1 · m−2 decrement in CI; 95% confidence interval, 1.14–1.70; P=0.001).
  • Sep 27, 2011 ... decrement in CI; 95% confidence interval, 1.14–1.70; P 0.001). Among HF patients with EOV, exercise CI was inversely related to EOV cycle ...
  • Nov 17, 2012 ... in CI 95%, 50% intervals obviously differed in Wopt between the N2O and NO fluxes (Tables 1 and 2). 3.4. Emission Factor. [30] By using the ...

Alternatives:

  • with a confidence interval of 95%

at CI=95%.

This phrase is not correct in English.

The correct way to express this concept is 'with a confidence interval of 95%.'
  • Mar 27, 2012 ... ... curve of 0.781 for TAT (CI 95% 0.68-0.86) compared to 0.709 for peak VO2 (CI 95% 0.60-0.80) and 0.625 for VO2 at AT (CI 95% 0.51-0.72).
  • Jun 17, 2015 ... ... CMAC, overall endotracheal intubation success by a critical care transport practitioner increased from 94.9% to 99.0% (significant at CI 95%, ...
  • Aug 5, 2014 ... The significance level was set at CI=95% (p-value≤0.05). A statistical analysis of all data was performed by using PASW SPSS ver.
  • from 1989 – 2010; R2 = 0.003, p = 0.79 fails t-test at CI = 95%. (C) Mean winter Toolik LTER SAT 1 m 1989 – 2010; R2 = 0.013, p = 0.61 fails t-test at CI = 95%.

Alternatives:

  • with a confidence interval of 95%

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!

×

💝 TextRanch Holidays Offer! 💝️

25% special discount
Stock up on credits for the entire year!

Grab this offer now!