"implication for" vs "implication in"

Question

"implication for" vs "implication in"

Both "implication for" and "implication in" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Implication for" is used when discussing the consequences or effects of something, while "implication in" is used when referring to involvement or connection to something.

Last Updated: March 29, 2024

Use "implication for" when discussing the consequences or effects of something. It indicates the impact or significance of a particular situation, action, or decision.

Examples:

The new policy has significant implications for the company's future.
His actions have serious implications for the project.
What are the implications for the economy?
The study explores the implications for social change.
The decision has far-reaching implications for the community.

Alternatives:

consequences for
effects on
impact on

Use "implication in" when referring to involvement or connection to something. It indicates being a part of or having a relationship with a particular situation, action, or context.

Examples:

She has no implication in the crime.
His implication in the scandal was minimal.
The company's implication in the project was crucial.
There is no implication in his decision.
The suspect's implication in the robbery is being investigated.

Alternatives:

involvement in
connection to
participation in

Answer 1

implication for

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

implication in

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"implication for" vs "implication in"

implication for

implication in

Related Comparisons