TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

implicated in vs implicated by

Both "implicated in" and "implicated by" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Implicated in" is used when referring to someone being involved in a situation or crime, while "implicated by" is used when referring to someone being accused or blamed for something.

Last updated: March 22, 2024 • 745 views

implicated in

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used when referring to someone being involved in a situation or crime.

Examples:

  • He was implicated in the robbery.
  • She was implicated in the scandal.
  • The company was implicated in the fraud.
  • They were implicated in the conspiracy.
  • The suspect was implicated in the murder.
  • This was your first conviction, but you were implicated in a dozen other schemes and frauds.
  • Assange was implicated in another hack.
  • Haqqani was also implicated in an attack on ministry buildings in Kabul in February 2009.
  • Since the Emperor's death, the Crown Prince has been implicated in the deaths and disfigurements of almost one hundred people.
  • They're from a toy which was implicated in the deaths of a number of children last year.
  • You're not implicated in the death of Senator Boyette so you'll have to answer the question.
  • You're a professional criminal implicated in several murders.
  • In addition, Hezbollah - supported by Syria - has been implicated in a wave of political assassinations in Lebanon.
  • It's the third time he's been implicated in an act of extreme violence in as many years.
  • He's been implicated in almost a dozen murders, all of them bombings.
  • Police also say businessman Ronald Marshall has been implicated in at least one of Deadshot's alleged assassinations.
  • [Mr De Magistris:] Mastella was implicated in one of my investigations and tried to stop me.
  • Ties to the Government and implicated in activities that seriously undermine democracy, respect for human rights and the rule of law.
  • Ties to the Government and implicated in activities that undermine the rule of law.
  • Ties to the Government and implicated in activities that seriously undermine freedom of expression and the media.
  • Prime Minister of Colonel Qadhafi's Government; implicated in repressive actions against demonstrators
  • Minister for Planning and Finance in Colonel Qadhafi's Government; implicated in repressive actions against demonstrators
  • You're implicated in a conspiracy to sabotage the most expensive and the most secret project in military history.
  • That no one else is implicated in this folly of yours?
  • All these types are implicated in this Decision.

Alternatives:

  • involved in
  • connected to
  • associated with
  • linked to

implicated by

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used when referring to someone being accused or blamed for something.

Examples:

  • He was implicated by the evidence.
  • She was implicated by her own words.
  • The company was implicated by the whistleblower.
  • They were implicated by the investigation.
  • The suspect was implicated by the witness.
  • The information forwarded shall include the identity of the person implicated by the investigation, a summary of the facts established, a preliminary legal evaluation and any financial loss.
  • the Office shall give the person implicated by the investigation the opportunity to comment on the matters concerning him subject to the conditions, and in accordance with the arrangements, set out in the second and third subparagraphs of Article 7a(2).
  • Mr President, since I have been personally implicated by certain speakers, I must ask to take the floor for personal reasons.
  • Anyone personally implicated by an investigation may ask the Review Adviser to give an opinion regarding the procedural guarantees provided for in Article 6(5) and Article 7a.
  • 2. Taking into account the results of the monitoring referred to in paragraph 1 and in Article 10 (4), Member States shall ensure that wild game and wild game meat from hunting areas implicated by the monitoring is excluded from trade.
  • Taking into account the results of the monitoring referred to in paragraph 1 and in Article 10 (4), Member States shall ensure that wild game and wild game meat from hunting areas implicated by the monitoring is excluded from trade.
  • 3. Anyone personally implicated by an investigation may ask the Review Adviser to give an opinion regarding the procedural guarantees provided for in Article 6(5) and Article 7a. The Review Adviser may also issue opinions of his own motion on those matters.
  • Taking into account the results of the monitoring referred to Article 11 (4), Member States shall impose limitations on the use of game meat from holdings or territories implicated by the monitoring.
  • 2. Taking into account the results of the monitoring referred to Article 11 (4), Member States shall impose limitations on the use of game meat from holdings or territories implicated by the monitoring.
  • Restricting the rights of the person implicated by the investigation and the guarantees afforded him as provided for in this Article shall be permissible only if such restrictions are in accordance with the opinion adopted beforehand by the Review Adviser pursuant to Article 4(3).
  • The information forwarded shall include the identity of the person implicated by the investigation, a summary of the facts established, a preliminary legal evaluation and any financial loss.

Alternatives:

  • accused by
  • blamed by
  • pointed to by
  • held responsible by

Related Comparisons

involved in vs involved on involved in vs involved at involved in vs involved to involved in taking on vs involved in investigated in vs investigated on charged in vs charged to

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!