"I'm like a mushroom that walks" vs "I'm like a mushroom who walks"

Question

"I'm like a mushroom that walks" vs "I'm like a mushroom who walks"

Both phrases are correct, but they convey slightly different meanings. 'I'm like a mushroom that walks' implies a comparison between the speaker and a mushroom that has the ability to walk, while 'I'm like a mushroom who walks' suggests a personification of the mushroom, attributing the ability to walk to it. The choice between 'that' and 'who' depends on whether you want to emphasize the speaker's similarity to the mushroom or personify the mushroom itself.

Last Updated: March 24, 2024

This phrase is used to compare oneself to a mushroom that has the ability to walk, emphasizing the speaker's characteristics or behavior.

Alternatives:

I'm like a mushroom that grows
I'm like a mushroom that glows
I'm like a mushroom that changes
I'm like a mushroom that stands out

This phrase is used to personify the mushroom, suggesting that the mushroom has the ability to walk, similar to a person.

Alternatives:

I'm like a mushroom who talks
I'm like a mushroom who dances
I'm like a mushroom who sings
I'm like a mushroom who thinks

Answer 1

I'm like a mushroom that walks

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to express a comparison between the speaker and a mushroom with the ability to walk.

Answer 2

I'm like a mushroom who walks

This phrase is correct and can be used to personify the mushroom, attributing the ability to walk to it.

"I'm like a mushroom that walks" vs "I'm like a mushroom who walks"

I'm like a mushroom that walks

I'm like a mushroom who walks

Related Comparisons