"identified homogeneous" vs "identified homogeneous areas"

Question

"identified homogeneous" vs "identified homogeneous areas"

Both phrases are not directly comparable as they convey slightly different meanings. 'Identified homogeneous areas' refers to specific regions or zones that are homogeneous, while 'identified homogeneous' is incomplete and lacks context. To make a meaningful comparison, 'identified homogeneous areas' is a more complete and correct phrase.

Last Updated: March 19, 2024

This phrase would need additional information or context to make sense. It could be part of a sentence like 'identified homogeneous patterns' or 'identified homogeneous groups.'

This phrase is used when referring to areas or regions that exhibit homogeneity in terms of characteristics, features, or composition.

Examples:

The study identified homogeneous areas in terms of income distribution.
The research project aimed to identify homogeneous areas for demographic analysis.
The map clearly shows the identified homogeneous areas in terms of vegetation types.
The team identified homogeneous areas for the purpose of urban planning.
The report highlighted the identified homogeneous areas for further investigation.

Answer 1

identified homogeneous

This phrase is incomplete and lacks context. It does not convey a clear meaning on its own.

Answer 2

identified homogeneous areas

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English. It refers to specific regions or zones that are homogeneous in nature.

"identified homogeneous" vs "identified homogeneous areas"

identified homogeneous

identified homogeneous areas

Related Comparisons