"i worked in romania" vs "i was working in romania"

Question

"i worked in romania" vs "i was working in romania"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'I worked in Romania' is used to talk about a completed action in the past, while 'I was working in Romania' is used to describe an ongoing action in the past. The choice between the two depends on whether you want to emphasize the completion of the action or the ongoing nature of the work.

Last Updated: March 20, 2024

This phrase is used to describe a past action that was completed. It indicates that the action of working in Romania is finished.

Examples:

I worked in Romania for two years before moving to Spain.
She worked in Romania as a volunteer last summer.

Alternatives:

I have worked in Romania
I used to work in Romania
I had worked in Romania
I worked in Romania last year
I worked in Romania for a while

This phrase is used to describe an action that was in progress in the past. It indicates that the action of working in Romania was ongoing at a specific point in the past.

Examples:

I was working in Romania when I received the job offer from the US.
She was working in Romania as a translator at that time.

Alternatives:

I used to work in Romania
I had been working in Romania
I was working in Romania last year
I was working in Romania for a while
I was working in Romania until last month

Answer 1

i worked in romania

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to talk about a completed action in the past.

Answer 2

i was working in romania

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to describe an ongoing action in the past.

"i worked in romania" vs "i was working in romania"

i worked in romania

i was working in romania

Related Comparisons