"I was in london" vs "I went to london"

Question

"I was in london" vs "I went to london"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'I went to London' is used when you want to express the action of traveling to London in the past. 'I was in London' is used when you want to indicate that you were physically present in London at some point in the past.

Last Updated: March 22, 2024

This phrase is used to talk about being physically present in London at a specific point in the past. It indicates a state of being in a particular location.

Examples:

When I was in London, I visited the Tower of London.
She was in London for a week.
They were in London during the summer.
I was in London last year.
He was in London on vacation.

Alternatives:

I stayed in London.
I lived in London.
I resided in London.
I spent time in London.
I sojourned in London.

This phrase is used to talk about the action of traveling to London at a specific point in the past. It indicates movement from one place to another.

Examples:

Last summer, I went to London for vacation.
She went to London to attend a conference.
They went to London to visit their relatives.
We went to London by train.
He went to London on business.

Alternatives:

I traveled to London.
I visited London.
I journeyed to London.
I made a trip to London.
I took a trip to London.

Answer 1

I was in london

This phrase is correct and commonly used to indicate that you were physically present in London at some point in the past.

Answer 2

I went to london

This phrase is correct and commonly used to indicate the action of traveling to London in the past.

"I was in london" vs "I went to london"

I was in london

I went to london

Related Comparisons