TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

i was not at the seat vs i was not on the seat

Both phrases are correct, but they have slightly different meanings. 'I was not at the seat' implies that the person was not near the seat, while 'I was not on the seat' suggests that the person was not physically sitting on the seat. The choice between the two phrases depends on the specific context and what the speaker wants to convey.

Last updated: March 31, 2024

i was not at the seat

This phrase is correct and can be used to indicate that the person was not near the seat.

This phrase is used to convey that the person was not in the vicinity of the seat or close to it.

Alternatives:

  • I was not near the seat
  • I was not close to the seat

i was not on the seat

This phrase is correct and is used to indicate that the person was not physically sitting on the seat.

This phrase is used to convey that the person was not occupying the seat physically.

Alternatives:

  • I was not sitting on the seat
  • I was not occupying the seat

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!