I studied vs I have been studied

The correct phrase is 'I studied.' 'I have been studied' is incorrect because it uses the passive voice and does not make sense in this context. 'I studied' is the simple past tense of the verb 'study' and is used to talk about a completed action in the past.

Last updated: March 31, 2024 • 732 views

I studied

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Use 'I studied' to talk about a completed action of studying in the past.

Examples:

I studied for my exam last night.
She studied French in college.

Show examples from the web [+]

I studied harder than you could imagine.
I studied time dilation and quantum teleportation in college.
In the meantime, I studied its language and read its talmon.
I studied the names on the list.
I studied the semicircular canals in second-year medicine.
At Oxford, I studied mostly economics and philosophy.
I studied all your achievements at Peacekeeper training.
And to say that little English I studied.
I studied three weeks for a pap smear.
I studied cryptology even before I joined the Bureau.
I studied all week for this test.
Not bad, I studied law.
I studied his file when I was in training.
I studied veterinary science for two years.
I studied his career in school.
I studied one year at International High School in New York.
I studied the Ono Ittoryu style under my father.
Because I studied the maps when we arrived here.
I studied and got a part-time job at the newspaper.
I studied philosophy, the history of religion, aesthetics.

I have been studied

This phrase is incorrect and does not make sense in this context.

Show examples from the web [+]

Parliament's amendments have been studied.
Absolute bioavailability of the febuxostat tablet formulation has not been studied.
Aprepitant has been studied at higher doses.
Vaccine protective efficacy has not been studied.
Patients with known cardiovascular disease have not been studied.
Patients with diabetes mellitus have not been studied.
Kaletra pharmacokinetics have not been studied in the elderly.
Corlentor has been studied in clinical trials involving nearly 5,000 participants.
Tipranavir pharmacokinetics have not been studied in patients with renal impairment.
FORSTEO has not been studied in patients with active urolithiasis.
Its protective effectiveness has not been studied in males.
Neither subcutaneous nor intradermal administration has been studied.
Pegaptanib pharmacokinetics have not been studied in patients with hepatic impairment.
Changes in neurological signalling have not been studied in experimental animals.
Calcitonin has not been studied in pregnant women.
Ritonavir pharmacokinetic parameters have not been studied in patients with renal impairment.
Concomitant administration with chronic NSAIDs has not been studied.
Inter- and intraindividual pharmacokinetic variabilities have not been studied systematically.
Mixing Humalog Mix25 with other insulins has not been studied.
InductOs has been studied in a canine spinal implantation model.

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9).

"Thank you!"
Sachi Nakama July 2024
"I have literally been through chat, PI, claude, bard and bing and I got conflicting answers! Thank you! Human intelligence reigns!"
Retha July 2024
"Faster than AI"
CYNTHIA December 2023
"This was very helpful and I personally think this site is the best."
Kaden October 2023
"It was extremely thorough and very helpful!"
imperialelisa October 2023
"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"
Zubair Alam October 2023
"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."
Selena October 2023
"Without textranch I would be stuck!"
宏祐 October 2023
"Accuracy and fast response. Personal comments from editor. Thank you."
Clh September 2023
"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"
Arturo September 2023
"The fact that you can get reliable fast feedback on your texts."
Vinicius Antonio August 2023
"you guys are better than grammarly i'm being honest here"
ordinary July 2023
"OMG! This is really good than any other text correction tools I've used so far. Highly recommend this."
Vehan July 2023
"Very fast and accurate. thank you."
mojtaba July 2023
"I love this app because it's help to writing skills all of students ♥️"
Tarisini July 2023
"This was exactly the mistake I was looking for, the wording dind´t sound right at first. Better than grammarly!"
Ente July 2023
"The immediate help that I received was reassuring and very satisfactory. Thanks."
priiiyanshuu July 2023
"this helps A LOT for my studies."
kathnunez02 June 2023
"Woow!! I would never have expected such precision! Thank you soooo much!!"
Berta June 2023
"Real Time Editor and not AI. Many Thanks."
Priya June 2023
"The very first thing excites me about Textranch is how much your editors care."
sepideh June 2023
"The fact that texts are checked by human editors rather than by AI, etc. I appreciate this!"
Анна June 2023
"Feel welcome, immediate response, high quality feedback"
martin.roy June 2023
"This is the best app that I have ever seen"
Burulai May 2023

I studied vs I have been studied

I studied

I have been studied

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying