I have submitted the draft with vs I have submitted the draft to

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'I have submitted the draft with' is typically followed by the object or tool used to submit the draft, while 'I have submitted the draft to' is followed by the recipient or destination of the draft. They are not directly comparable as they serve different purposes.

Last updated: March 24, 2024 • 950 views

I have submitted the draft with

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when specifying the object or tool used to submit the draft.

This phrase is used to indicate the object or tool that was used to submit the draft. For example, 'I have submitted the draft with the new editing software.'

Examples:

I have submitted the draft with the online submission form.
I have submitted the draft with the help of my colleague.
I have submitted the draft with the required changes.
I have submitted the draft with the updated information.
I have submitted the draft with the necessary attachments.

Show examples from the web [+]

The rapporteur Member State submitted the draft assessment report to the Commission on 22 November 2002.
The Commission shall, by 1 January 2014, submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a report specifying whether the ESA have submitted the draft technical standards foreseen in this Directive, where such submission is mandatory or optional, with any appropriate proposals.
At the end of May it submitted the draft to the Council and Parliament for advice.
At the time of writing, six political groups have submitted draft resolutions on the subject.
The rapporteur Member State submitted the draft assessment reports to the Commission on 12 December 2005 (fluopicolide) and on 30 November 2005 (pinoxaden).
The rapporteur Member State submitted the Draft Assessment Report for the substance on 26 January 2001 on the basis of all the studies available at that time.
The rapporteur Member State submitted the draft assessment report to the Commission on 3 August 2002.
The rapporteur Member State submitted the draft assessment report to the Commission on 19 September 2005.
The rapporteur Member States submitted the draft assessment reports to the Commission on 15 September 2009 (ametoctradin) and on 27 August 2009 (disodium phosphonate), respectively.
The rapporteur Member State submitted the draft assessment report to the Commission on 16 December 2009.
Now the Council has submitted a draft with a figure EUR 10.3 billion below the ceiling.
The rapporteur Member States submitted the draft assessment reports to the Commission on 10 May 2004 (benthiavalicarb), 9 June 2006 (proquinazid), 9 November 2005 (silver thiosulphate), respectively.
The rapporteur Member States submitted the draft assessment reports to the Commission on 30 January 2006 (cyflufenamid), 18 February 2005 (FEN 560), 24 May 2005 (flonicamid), respectively.
The rapporteur Member States submitted the draft assessment reports to the Commission on 12 October 2001 (etoxazole) and 16 October 2000 (carvone).
An implementing act was deemed to be necessary and the chair submitted the draft implementing act to the appeal committee for further deliberation.
An implementing act was deemed to be necessary and the chair submitted the draft implementing act to the appeal committee for further deliberation.
Since an implementing act was deemed to be necessary, the chair submitted the draft implementing act to the appeal committee for further deliberation.
An implementing act was deemed to be necessary and the chair submitted the draft implementing act to the appeal committee for further deliberation.
The rapporteur Member States submitted the draft assessment reports to the Commission on 6 March 2008 (emamectin) and on 10 December 2009 (maltodextrin), respectively.
The draft submitted by the Commission is not due to be adopted before the middle of 2006.

I have submitted the draft to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when indicating the recipient or destination of the draft.

This phrase is used to specify the recipient or destination of the draft. For example, 'I have submitted the draft to the professor.'

Examples:

I have submitted the draft to the editor for review.
I have submitted the draft to the committee for approval.
I have submitted the draft to the client for feedback.
I have submitted the draft to the publishing house for consideration.
I have submitted the draft to the appropriate department.

Show examples from the web [+]

At the end of May it submitted the draft to the Council and Parliament for advice.
The rapporteur Member State submitted the draft assessment report to the Commission on 22 November 2002.
The Commission shall, by 1 January 2014, submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a report specifying whether the ESA have submitted the draft technical standards foreseen in this Directive, where such submission is mandatory or optional, with any appropriate proposals.
At the time of writing, six political groups have submitted draft resolutions on the subject.
The rapporteur Member State submitted the draft assessment reports to the Commission on 12 December 2005 (fluopicolide) and on 30 November 2005 (pinoxaden).
The rapporteur Member State submitted the Draft Assessment Report for the substance on 26 January 2001 on the basis of all the studies available at that time.
The rapporteur Member State submitted the draft assessment report to the Commission on 3 August 2002.
The rapporteur Member State submitted the draft assessment report to the Commission on 19 September 2005.
The rapporteur Member States submitted the draft assessment reports to the Commission on 15 September 2009 (ametoctradin) and on 27 August 2009 (disodium phosphonate), respectively.
The rapporteur Member State submitted the draft assessment report to the Commission on 16 December 2009.
If the Commission is happy to act as the clerk that draws up the Council's legislation, it could at least have submitted a draft to us that complied better with the legal requirements that we have the right to expect from a legislative text.
The rapporteur Member States submitted the draft assessment reports to the Commission on 10 May 2004 (benthiavalicarb), 9 June 2006 (proquinazid), 9 November 2005 (silver thiosulphate), respectively.
The rapporteur Member States submitted the draft assessment reports to the Commission on 30 January 2006 (cyflufenamid), 18 February 2005 (FEN 560), 24 May 2005 (flonicamid), respectively.
The rapporteur Member States submitted the draft assessment reports to the Commission on 12 October 2001 (etoxazole) and 16 October 2000 (carvone).
An implementing act was deemed to be necessary and the chair submitted the draft implementing act to the appeal committee for further deliberation.
An implementing act was deemed to be necessary and the chair submitted the draft implementing act to the appeal committee for further deliberation.
Since an implementing act was deemed to be necessary, the chair submitted the draft implementing act to the appeal committee for further deliberation.
An implementing act was deemed to be necessary and the chair submitted the draft implementing act to the appeal committee for further deliberation.
The rapporteur Member States submitted the draft assessment reports to the Commission on 6 March 2008 (emamectin) and on 10 December 2009 (maltodextrin), respectively.
The draft submitted by the Commission is not due to be adopted before the middle of 2006.

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9).

"Thank you!"
Sachi Nakama July 2024
"I have literally been through chat, PI, claude, bard and bing and I got conflicting answers! Thank you! Human intelligence reigns!"
Retha July 2024
"Faster than AI"
CYNTHIA December 2023
"This was very helpful and I personally think this site is the best."
Kaden October 2023
"It was extremely thorough and very helpful!"
imperialelisa October 2023
"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"
Zubair Alam October 2023
"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."
Selena October 2023
"Without textranch I would be stuck!"
宏祐 October 2023
"Accuracy and fast response. Personal comments from editor. Thank you."
Clh September 2023
"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"
Arturo September 2023
"The fact that you can get reliable fast feedback on your texts."
Vinicius Antonio August 2023
"you guys are better than grammarly i'm being honest here"
ordinary July 2023
"OMG! This is really good than any other text correction tools I've used so far. Highly recommend this."
Vehan July 2023
"Very fast and accurate. thank you."
mojtaba July 2023
"I love this app because it's help to writing skills all of students ♥️"
Tarisini July 2023
"This was exactly the mistake I was looking for, the wording dind´t sound right at first. Better than grammarly!"
Ente July 2023
"The immediate help that I received was reassuring and very satisfactory. Thanks."
priiiyanshuu July 2023
"this helps A LOT for my studies."
kathnunez02 June 2023
"Woow!! I would never have expected such precision! Thank you soooo much!!"
Berta June 2023
"Real Time Editor and not AI. Many Thanks."
Priya June 2023
"The very first thing excites me about Textranch is how much your editors care."
sepideh June 2023
"The fact that texts are checked by human editors rather than by AI, etc. I appreciate this!"
Анна June 2023
"Feel welcome, immediate response, high quality feedback"
martin.roy June 2023
"This is the best app that I have ever seen"
Burulai May 2023

I have submitted the draft with vs I have submitted the draft to