I have submitted the draft with vs I have submitted the draft to

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'I have submitted the draft with' is typically followed by the object or tool used to submit the draft, while 'I have submitted the draft to' is followed by the recipient or destination of the draft. They are not directly comparable as they serve different purposes.

Last updated: March 24, 2024 • 1064 views

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when specifying the object or tool used to submit the draft.

"I have submitted the draft with "

This phrase is used to indicate the object or tool that was used to submit the draft. For example, 'I have submitted the draft with the new editing software.'

Examples:

I have submitted the draft with the online submission form.
I have submitted the draft with the help of my colleague.
I have submitted the draft with the required changes.
I have submitted the draft with the updated information.
I have submitted the draft with the necessary attachments.

Show examples from the web [+]

The rapporteur Member State submitted the draft assessment report to the Commission on 22 November 2002.
The Commission shall, by 1 January 2014, submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a report specifying whether the ESA have submitted the draft technical standards foreseen in this Directive, where such submission is mandatory or optional, with any appropriate proposals.
At the end of May it submitted the draft to the Council and Parliament for advice.
At the time of writing, six political groups have submitted draft resolutions on the subject.
The rapporteur Member State submitted the draft assessment reports to the Commission on 12 December 2005 (fluopicolide) and on 30 November 2005 (pinoxaden).
The rapporteur Member State submitted the Draft Assessment Report for the substance on 26 January 2001 on the basis of all the studies available at that time.
The rapporteur Member State submitted the draft assessment report to the Commission on 3 August 2002.
The rapporteur Member State submitted the draft assessment report to the Commission on 19 September 2005.
The rapporteur Member States submitted the draft assessment reports to the Commission on 15 September 2009 (ametoctradin) and on 27 August 2009 (disodium phosphonate), respectively.
The rapporteur Member State submitted the draft assessment report to the Commission on 16 December 2009.
Now the Council has submitted a draft with a figure EUR 10.3 billion below the ceiling.
The rapporteur Member States submitted the draft assessment reports to the Commission on 10 May 2004 (benthiavalicarb), 9 June 2006 (proquinazid), 9 November 2005 (silver thiosulphate), respectively.
The rapporteur Member States submitted the draft assessment reports to the Commission on 30 January 2006 (cyflufenamid), 18 February 2005 (FEN 560), 24 May 2005 (flonicamid), respectively.
The rapporteur Member States submitted the draft assessment reports to the Commission on 12 October 2001 (etoxazole) and 16 October 2000 (carvone).
An implementing act was deemed to be necessary and the chair submitted the draft implementing act to the appeal committee for further deliberation.
An implementing act was deemed to be necessary and the chair submitted the draft implementing act to the appeal committee for further deliberation.
Since an implementing act was deemed to be necessary, the chair submitted the draft implementing act to the appeal committee for further deliberation.
An implementing act was deemed to be necessary and the chair submitted the draft implementing act to the appeal committee for further deliberation.
The rapporteur Member States submitted the draft assessment reports to the Commission on 6 March 2008 (emamectin) and on 10 December 2009 (maltodextrin), respectively.
The draft submitted by the Commission is not due to be adopted before the middle of 2006.

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when indicating the recipient or destination of the draft.

"I have submitted the draft to"

This phrase is used to specify the recipient or destination of the draft. For example, 'I have submitted the draft to the professor.'

Examples:

I have submitted the draft to the editor for review.
I have submitted the draft to the committee for approval.
I have submitted the draft to the client for feedback.
I have submitted the draft to the publishing house for consideration.
I have submitted the draft to the appropriate department.

Show examples from the web [+]

At the end of May it submitted the draft to the Council and Parliament for advice.
The rapporteur Member State submitted the draft assessment report to the Commission on 22 November 2002.
The Commission shall, by 1 January 2014, submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a report specifying whether the ESA have submitted the draft technical standards foreseen in this Directive, where such submission is mandatory or optional, with any appropriate proposals.
At the time of writing, six political groups have submitted draft resolutions on the subject.
The rapporteur Member State submitted the draft assessment reports to the Commission on 12 December 2005 (fluopicolide) and on 30 November 2005 (pinoxaden).
The rapporteur Member State submitted the Draft Assessment Report for the substance on 26 January 2001 on the basis of all the studies available at that time.
The rapporteur Member State submitted the draft assessment report to the Commission on 3 August 2002.
The rapporteur Member State submitted the draft assessment report to the Commission on 19 September 2005.
The rapporteur Member States submitted the draft assessment reports to the Commission on 15 September 2009 (ametoctradin) and on 27 August 2009 (disodium phosphonate), respectively.
The rapporteur Member State submitted the draft assessment report to the Commission on 16 December 2009.
If the Commission is happy to act as the clerk that draws up the Council's legislation, it could at least have submitted a draft to us that complied better with the legal requirements that we have the right to expect from a legislative text.
The rapporteur Member States submitted the draft assessment reports to the Commission on 10 May 2004 (benthiavalicarb), 9 June 2006 (proquinazid), 9 November 2005 (silver thiosulphate), respectively.
The rapporteur Member States submitted the draft assessment reports to the Commission on 30 January 2006 (cyflufenamid), 18 February 2005 (FEN 560), 24 May 2005 (flonicamid), respectively.
The rapporteur Member States submitted the draft assessment reports to the Commission on 12 October 2001 (etoxazole) and 16 October 2000 (carvone).
An implementing act was deemed to be necessary and the chair submitted the draft implementing act to the appeal committee for further deliberation.
An implementing act was deemed to be necessary and the chair submitted the draft implementing act to the appeal committee for further deliberation.
Since an implementing act was deemed to be necessary, the chair submitted the draft implementing act to the appeal committee for further deliberation.
An implementing act was deemed to be necessary and the chair submitted the draft implementing act to the appeal committee for further deliberation.
The rapporteur Member States submitted the draft assessment reports to the Commission on 6 March 2008 (emamectin) and on 10 December 2009 (maltodextrin), respectively.
The draft submitted by the Commission is not due to be adopted before the middle of 2006.

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

Emails and short texts
Proofreading & editing
Ready in 5-10 minutes

SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

Documents of any type (*.docx)
Advanced & Premium editing
Ready in as little as 4 hours

UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

Personalized answers to your language questions
Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
Ready in 24 hours

ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

3. Receive Your Polished Text

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Zubair
from Bangladesh

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Arturo
from Mexico

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Selena
from USA

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Ifiok
from Nigeria

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Wilson
from France

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Susan
from Germany

I have submitted the draft with vs I have submitted the draft to