"i was sent." vs "i had sent."

Question

"i was sent." vs "i had sent."

Both phrases are correct, but they have different meanings and are used in different contexts. 'I had sent' is used when referring to an action that was completed in the past before another past event. 'I was sent' is used when referring to being dispatched or directed to a place or situation by someone else in the past.

Last Updated: March 28, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate that someone was dispatched or directed to a place or situation by someone else in the past. It is often used in passive voice constructions.

Examples:

I was sent to the store to buy groceries.
He was sent on a mission by his superiors.

Alternatives:

I got sent.
I was dispatched.
I was directed.
I was assigned.
I was delegated.

This phrase is used to indicate that the action of sending something was completed before another event in the past. It is often used in past perfect tense constructions.

Examples:

I had sent the email before the meeting started.
She had sent the package by the time I arrived.

Alternatives:

I had already sent.
I had sent it.
I had sent it already.
I had sent it before.
I had sent it earlier.

Answer 1

i was sent.

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when referring to being dispatched or directed to a place or situation by someone else in the past.

Answer 2

i had sent.

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when referring to an action that was completed in the past before another past event.

"i was sent." vs "i had sent."

i was sent.

i had sent.

Related Comparisons