"I came to office." vs "I had come to office."

Question

"I came to office." vs "I had come to office."

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'I came to office' is used to describe a past action that happened at a specific time, while 'I had come to office' is used to indicate a past action that occurred before another past action. The choice between the two depends on the intended meaning and the context of the sentence.

Last Updated: March 30, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate that the speaker arrived at the office in the past. It is a simple past tense construction.

Examples:

I came to the office yesterday.
She came to the office early this morning.

Alternatives:

I arrived at the office.
I went to the office.
I got to the office.

This phrase is used in past perfect tense to show that the action of coming to the office happened before another past event. It adds a sense of completion or continuity to the past action.

Examples:

By the time she arrived, I had already come to the office.
I had come to the office before the meeting started.

Alternatives:

I had arrived at the office.
I had gone to the office.
I had gotten to the office.

Answer 1

I came to office.

This phrase is correct and commonly used to describe a past action that happened at a specific time.

Answer 2

I had come to office.

This phrase is correct and is used to indicate a past action that occurred before another past action.

"I came to office." vs "I had come to office."

I came to office.

I had come to office.

Related Comparisons