1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

"hypothesis of Barker" vs "hypothesis from Barker"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Hypothesis from Barker' implies that the hypothesis originates from Barker, while 'Hypothesis of Barker' suggests that the hypothesis belongs to Barker. The choice between 'from' and 'of' depends on whether you want to emphasize the origin or ownership of the hypothesis.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

hypothesis of Barker

This phrase is correct and can be used when referring to a hypothesis that belongs to Barker.

This phrase is used when you want to emphasize that the hypothesis is associated with Barker, indicating ownership or authorship.

Examples:

  • The hypothesis of Barker has been widely debated in the scientific community.
  • This is a key hypothesis of Barker's research.

Alternatives:

  • Barker's hypothesis
  • hypothesis by Barker
  • hypothesis proposed by Barker

hypothesis from Barker

This phrase is correct and can be used when referring to a hypothesis that originates from Barker.

This phrase is used when you want to emphasize that the hypothesis comes from Barker, indicating its origin.

Examples:

  • The hypothesis from Barker suggests a new approach to the problem.
  • I read the hypothesis from Barker in the latest research paper.

Alternatives:

  • hypothesis by Barker
  • hypothesis proposed by Barker
  • Barker's hypothesis

Related Comparisons

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!