TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

high-quality data vs high quality data

Both "high-quality data" and "high quality data" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "High-quality data" is used when the phrase is acting as a compound adjective describing the noun "data." On the other hand, "high quality data" is used when the phrase is not acting as a compound adjective and the words are separate.

Last updated: March 31, 2024

high-quality data

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when describing data of superior quality.

Use "high-quality data" when you want to describe data that is of superior quality. The hyphen between "high" and "quality" indicates that the two words work together as a compound adjective to describe the noun "data."

Examples:

  • The research team collected high-quality data for their analysis.
  • It is essential to have high-quality data for accurate results.
  • High-quality data is crucial for making informed decisions.
  • The company invested in high-quality data management tools.
  • The success of the project depended on high-quality data.
  • Thus, we must find means of developing an appropriate and effective tool to complement GDP, which could be applied in a practical way, using clearly defined indicators and relying on high-quality data.
  • Calls on the Commission to provide assistance and expertise to Member States to help them tackle research constraints and major methodological obstacles, with a view to ensuring compliance and provision of high-quality data;
  • The regulation provides an opportunity to collect high-quality data on housing.
  • In any case the decision on the accession of the individual member states should be based on current, reliable and definite high-quality data.
  • Recycling and prevention of waste, air emissions and climatic change and sustainable consumption and production could be monitored much more effectively if high-quality data were available regarding the interaction between environmental and economic factors.
  • ensuring the proactive and proportionate collection of high-quality data relevant to safety and post-authorisation risk management;
  • The use of consistent, high-quality data to report on fluorinated greenhouse gas emissions is essential to ensuring the quality of emissions reporting.
  • Member States shall ensure that the data collection and compilation in accordance with Annexes I and II provide comprehensible and comparable high-quality data that are representative of their respective natural gas and electricity prices and consumption.
  • Calls on the Member States to give the Commission the possibility to check the fulfilment of the Maastricht criteria on the basis of definite, current, reliable and high-quality data
  • Calls on the Member States to allow the Commission to assess compliance with the Maastricht criteria on the basis of definite, current, reliable, and high-quality data;
  • It calls on the Member States to give the Commission the possibility to check the fulfilment of the Maastricht criteria on the basis of definite, current, reliable and high-quality data.

Alternatives:

  • top-notch data
  • premium data
  • superior data
  • excellent data
  • quality data

high quality data

This phrase is correct when the words are not acting as a compound adjective but are separate in the sentence.

Use "high quality data" when you want to emphasize the quality of the data without the words forming a compound adjective. In this case, "high" describes the quality of the data separately from the word "quality."

Examples:

  • The company is known for providing high quality data services.
  • We need to ensure high quality data collection methods.
  • The team focuses on maintaining high quality data standards.
  • High quality data analysis is crucial for decision-making.
  • The report highlighted the importance of high quality data.
  • It is clear that, in order to formulate policies, there is a basic need for high quality data covering the whole of the European Union.
  • Which measures is the Commission going to take to improve access to high quality data in order to quantify expected impacts on SMEs?
  • It is necessary to ensure the availability of appropriately harmonised and high quality data on write-offs/write-downs on loans by addressing a requirement to the statistical reporting agents.
  • Such an infrastructure would provide all interested parties with the high quality data required to produce more timely and reliable analyses of increasingly complex financial markets, especially in times of turbulence.
  • In order to perform the necessary calculations, both competent authorities and ESMA need to be able to obtain robust and high quality data for each asset class to which Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 applies.
  • According to Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 452/2008, the Commission should adopt certain implementing measures in view of ensuring the transmission of high quality data.
  • The EESC recognises the benefit to EU citizens and patients of the new provisions for pharmacovigilance which will result in an improved access to health and medicines information and a proactive collection of high quality data on the safety of medicines.
  • - specify appropriate management structures, enabling Member States to be involved in methodological and development work, and to be in a position to take the necessary decisions, ensuring the development of relevant and high quality data, in accordance with the timetable;
  • The regulation provides an opportunity to collect high-quality data on housing.
  • In any case the decision on the accession of the individual member states should be based on current, reliable and definite high-quality data.
  • It calls on the Member States to give the Commission the possibility to check the fulfilment of the Maastricht criteria on the basis of definite, current, reliable and high-quality data.
  • Thus, we must find means of developing an appropriate and effective tool to complement GDP, which could be applied in a practical way, using clearly defined indicators and relying on high-quality data.
  • Recycling and prevention of waste, air emissions and climatic change and sustainable consumption and production could be monitored much more effectively if high-quality data were available regarding the interaction between environmental and economic factors.
  • The use of consistent, high-quality data to report on fluorinated greenhouse gas emissions is essential to ensuring the quality of emissions reporting.
  • Member States shall ensure that the data collection and compilation in accordance with Annexes I and II provide comprehensible and comparable high-quality data that are representative of their respective natural gas and electricity prices and consumption.
  • ensuring the proactive and proportionate collection of high-quality data relevant to safety and post-authorisation risk management;
  • Calls on the Member States to give the Commission the possibility to check the fulfilment of the Maastricht criteria on the basis of definite, current, reliable and high-quality data
  • Calls on the Member States to allow the Commission to assess compliance with the Maastricht criteria on the basis of definite, current, reliable, and high-quality data;
  • Calls on the Commission to provide assistance and expertise to Member States to help them tackle research constraints and major methodological obstacles, with a view to ensuring compliance and provision of high-quality data;
  • High-quality monitoring data, along with data on ecotoxicological and toxicological effects, are needed for the risk assessments that support the selection of new priority substances.

Alternatives:

  • data of high quality
  • data with high quality
  • data that is high quality
  • quality data that is high
  • data characterized by high quality

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!