"he is good in cooking" vs "he was good in cooking"

Question

"he is good in cooking" vs "he was good in cooking"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "He is good in cooking" is used to talk about someone's current ability in cooking, while "He was good in cooking" is used to talk about someone's past ability in cooking.

Last Updated: March 08, 2024

This phrase is used to describe someone's skill or proficiency in cooking at the present moment.

Examples:

He is good in cooking, so we always ask him to prepare dinner.
She is good in cooking various cuisines from around the world.
I am not good in cooking, so I prefer to eat out.
They are good in cooking healthy meals for their family.
The chef is good in cooking seafood dishes.

Alternatives:

He is good at cooking
He is skilled in cooking
He is proficient in cooking
He is talented in cooking
He is an expert in cooking

This phrase is used to describe someone's skill or proficiency in cooking in the past.

Examples:

He was good in cooking when he was younger.
She was good in cooking before she started her new job.
I heard he was good in cooking when he was in college.
They said she was good in cooking when she lived in Italy.
My grandmother was good in cooking traditional dishes.

Alternatives:

He used to be good at cooking
He was skilled in cooking
He was proficient in cooking
He was talented in cooking
He was an expert in cooking

Answer 1

he is good in cooking

This phrase is correct and commonly used to talk about someone's current ability in cooking.

Answer 2

he was good in cooking

This phrase is correct and commonly used to talk about someone's past ability in cooking.

"he is good in cooking" vs "he was good in cooking"

he is good in cooking

he was good in cooking

Related Comparisons