"he has interviewed" vs "he had interviewed"

Question

"he has interviewed" vs "he had interviewed"

Both "he had interviewed" and "he has interviewed" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "He had interviewed" is used when referring to a past action that occurred before another past event, while "he has interviewed" is used when referring to a past action that has relevance to the present.

Last Updated: March 19, 2024

Use "he has interviewed" when you want to talk about an action that was completed in the past and has a connection to the present moment.

Examples:

He has interviewed all the key witnesses in the case.
She has interviewed many famous personalities during her career.
The journalist has interviewed the author on several occasions.

Alternatives:

he has conducted interviews
he has spoken with
he has met with
he has interrogated
he has conversed with

Use "he had interviewed" when you want to talk about an action that was completed before another action or event in the past.

Examples:

He had interviewed several candidates before making his decision.
By the time I arrived, he had interviewed all the applicants.
She had interviewed the suspect before the evidence was found.

Alternatives:

he had conducted interviews
he had spoken with
he had met with
he had interrogated
he had conversed with

Answer 1

he has interviewed

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when referring to a past action that has relevance to the present.

Answer 2

he had interviewed

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when referring to a past action that occurred before another past event.

"he has interviewed" vs "he had interviewed"

he has interviewed

he had interviewed

Related Comparisons