"have been widely done" vs "have widely been done"

Question

"have been widely done" vs "have widely been done"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Have widely been done' emphasizes the wide scope of the actions being done, while 'have been widely done' emphasizes that the actions have been done by many people. The choice between them depends on the specific emphasis the speaker wants to convey.

Last Updated: March 22, 2024

This phrase is used when you want to emphasize that the actions have been carried out by a large number of individuals.

Examples:

The experiments have been widely done by researchers worldwide.
The surveys have been widely done by different organizations.

Alternatives:

have been done by many
have been done by a large number of people
have been done extensively
have been done on a broad scale
have been done broadly

This phrase is used when you want to highlight that the actions have been done on a broad scale or in a widespread manner.

Examples:

The changes have widely been done across all departments.
The research methods have widely been done in various fields.

Alternatives:

have been widely carried out
have been done extensively
have been done on a large scale
have been done broadly
have been done extensively

Answer 1

have been widely done

This phrase is correct and emphasizes that the actions have been done by many people.

Answer 2

have widely been done

This phrase is correct and emphasizes the wide scope of the actions being done.

"have been widely done" vs "have widely been done"

have been widely done

have widely been done

Related Comparisons