"Have been given for" vs "Have given for"

Question

"Have been given for" vs "Have given for"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Have given for' is used when talking about actively providing something for a specific purpose, while 'have been given for' is used when referring to something that has been provided for a particular reason or cause.

Last Updated: March 31, 2024

This phrase is used when talking about something that has been given or provided for a specific purpose or cause.

Examples:

The funds have been given for research purposes.
The award has been given for outstanding achievement.
The grant has been given for community development.
The donation has been given for disaster relief efforts.
The scholarship has been given for academic excellence.

Alternatives:

have been allocated for
have been designated for
have been earmarked for
have been set aside for
have been reserved for

This phrase is used when talking about giving or providing something for a particular reason or purpose.

Examples:

I have given for charity.
She has given for a good cause.
They have given for the renovation project.
He has given for the scholarship fund.
We have given for disaster relief.

Alternatives:

have donated for
have contributed for
have provided for
have allocated for
have set aside for

Answer 1

Have been given for

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to something that has been provided for a particular reason or cause.

Answer 2

Have given for

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to actively providing something for a specific purpose.

"Have been given for" vs "Have given for"

Have been given for

Have given for

Related Comparisons