"have existed" vs "have exist"

Question

"have existed" vs "have exist"

The correct phrase is "have existed." The verb "exist" is used in the past participle form "existed" when combined with the auxiliary verb "have." This construction is commonly used in English to indicate actions or states that occurred in the past and continue to have relevance.

Last Updated: March 08, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate that something has been in existence up to the present moment. It is formed by combining the auxiliary verb "have" with the past participle form of the verb "exist," which is "existed."

Examples:

Dinosaurs have existed on Earth for millions of years.
The company has existed since 1990.
Many traditions have existed for centuries.
These ruins have existed for centuries.
The problem has existed for a long time.

Alternatives:

have been in existence
have been around
have been present
have been alive
have been extant

Answer 1

have existed

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

have exist

This phrase is incorrect in English. The verb "exist" should be in the past participle form "existed" when used with the auxiliary verb "have."

"have existed" vs "have exist"

have existed

have exist

Related Comparisons