TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

have been included in the curriculum vs were included in the curriculum

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Have been included in the curriculum' is used when referring to something that is currently part of the curriculum, while 'were included in the curriculum' is used when talking about something that was included in the past.

Last updated: March 20, 2024 • 752 views

have been included in the curriculum

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to something that is currently part of the curriculum.

This phrase is used to indicate that something has been recently added to the curriculum and is still part of it.

Examples:

  • The new science modules have been included in the curriculum for next semester.
  • Several new books have been included in the curriculum this year.
  • These on-campus, as well as online summer studio courses have been included in the curriculum to allow our students the opportunity to explore and ...
  • The inclusion of how social and physical sciences have been included in the curriculum to enhance the student learning experience would also be welcomed.
  • have been included in the curriculum. They think that language learning in schools will make a difference to. Shifts in society's attitudes and practices AND the.
  • More time is devoted to this subject at the high school levels, where the subject was more likely to have been included in the curriculum before the mandate.

Alternatives:

  • are included in the curriculum
  • have become part of the curriculum
  • have been added to the curriculum
  • have been integrated into the curriculum
  • have been incorporated into the curriculum

were included in the curriculum

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to something that was included in the past as part of the curriculum.

This phrase is used to talk about things that were part of the curriculum at a specific point in the past.

Examples:

  • The new textbooks were included in the curriculum last year.
  • The additional courses were included in the curriculum a few years ago.
  • were included in the curriculum, taught, and assessed in programs, both religiously affiliated and public. Methodology. A mixed-methods approach was used to ...
  • Educative curriculum features were included in the curriculum materials given to teachers. We attempted to design curriculum materials that were not teacher ...
  • curriculum materials in supporting reform-based practices in science? Educative curriculum features were included in the curriculum materials given to teachers.
  • More subjects were included in the curriculum content to cater to children who would continue on to secondary schools, as well as to those who would end their  ...

Alternatives:

  • were part of the curriculum
  • were integrated into the curriculum
  • were added to the curriculum
  • were part of the curriculum
  • were incorporated into the curriculum

Related Comparisons

have been discussed in the literature vs have been discussed on the literature has been in the business since vs had been in the business since has been in the business vs had been in the business have been included into the curriculum vs have been included in the curriculum

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!