"have already been receive" vs "had already been received"

Question

"have already been receive" vs "had already been received"

The correct phrase is "had already been received." The use of the past perfect tense (had + past participle) is appropriate when referring to an action that was completed before another past action. The phrase "have already been receive" is incorrect because it mixes present perfect and passive voice in an incorrect way.

Last Updated: March 29, 2024

The correct form should be "have already been received" when using present perfect passive voice.

Alternatives:

have already been received

Use this phrase when you want to indicate that something was already received before a specific past time or event.

Answer 1

have already been receive

This phrase is incorrect. It mixes present perfect and passive voice in an incorrect way.

Answer 2

had already been received

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to an action that was completed before another past action.

"have already been receive" vs "had already been received"

have already been receive

had already been received

Related Comparisons