Which one is correct?
"have a higher contribution to" or "have a lower contribution to"?

Question

Which one is correct?
"have a higher contribution to" or "have a lower contribution to"?

TextRanch: The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

One of our experts will correct your English.

100% Human-Powered Editing!

This phrase is used to express that something has a larger impact or share in a particular context.

Examples:

The new technology will have a higher contribution to improving efficiency.
Experienced team members have a higher contribution to project success.
Large corporations have a higher contribution to the country's GDP.

Alternatives:

have an increased contribution to
have an elevated contribution to
have a larger contribution to
contribute more to
play a bigger role in

This phrase is used to express that something has a smaller impact or share in a particular context.

Examples:

The new policy will have a lower contribution to reducing carbon emissions.
Younger employees tend to have a lower contribution to decision-making processes.
The smaller companies have a lower contribution to the overall market share.

Alternatives:

have a reduced contribution to
have a diminished contribution to
have a smaller contribution to
contribute less to
play a smaller role in

Both phrases are correct, but they convey opposite meanings. 'Have a lower contribution to' implies a smaller impact or share, while 'have a higher contribution to' implies a larger impact or share. The choice between the two depends on the context and the intended meaning.

Last Updated: March 19, 2024